Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Theodore C and Katherine P Bentley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$708kHuman Services$360kHealth$245kEducation$145kFood & Nutrition$130kArts & Culture$90kAnimals$15kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST$76,850
FRIENDS OF THE CLARK COUNTY FAIR$48,961
MINDS MATTER$25,000
YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH$20,000
YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH$20,000
BLACKPEARL FRIESIANS$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $1k → 14%MINDS MATTER NATIONAL INC: $15k → 17%BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $25k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $100k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE CLARK COUNTY FAIR: $49k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $70k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $75k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE CLARK COUNTY FAIR: $35k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $50k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $65k → 9%BLACKPEARL FRIESIANS: $7k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $19k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $50k → 9%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $20k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $9k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $25k → 9%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $20k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $6k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $20k → 9%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $20k → 9%ONE VET AT A TIME: $15k → 12%TREEHOUSE: $15k → 9%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $20k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $109k → 12%ROYAL RIDGES RETREAT AT ANDERSEN RANCH: $10k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $100k → 12%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $15k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $89k → 12%X CHANGE RECOVERY: $10k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $77k → 12%YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER - YEAH: $10k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $75k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $75k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $12k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $10k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $5k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NORTHWEST: $2k → 12%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 12%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $30k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $25k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $20k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $20k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $15k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $10k → 12%MINDS MATTER: $10k → 12%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 7 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$1.6M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TREEHOUSE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $350k · revenue +78%
  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $180k · revenue +91%
  • MINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +83%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +35%
  • MM
    MINDS MATTER NATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +132%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
2
Bald Ridge Lodge Inc

The mission of bald ridge lodge (brl) is to provide safe and stable support to young men in the group home, independent living program, and community based services, in a manner that nurtures the youth, strengthens healthy relationships,…

Human Services
3
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
4
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
5
Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc

Bridge over troubled waters provides effective and innovative services to homeless, at-risk, and runaway youth, helps youth avoid a lifetime of dependency on social services, guides youth towards self-sufficiency, and enables youth to…

Health
6
Mat-Su Youth Housing

Youth experiencing homelessness, and youth at risk of becoming homeless, are empowered to be contributing, self-supporting members of their community. we provide safe shelter and wrap-around services for youth with a hand-up not a hand-out…

Housing & Shelter
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southwest Washington

Our mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one mentoring relationships, changing their lived for the better, forever. our vision is that all children achieve success in…

8
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

9
The Matthews House

Vision: a community that is aware, belongs, and is self-sufficient. mission: empowering youth and families through connection, self efficacy, and independence. values: relationship-centered, assume the best of people, own your role,…

Human Services
10
Youth for Change

Youth For Change (YFC) mission is to enhance the well being of children, families, individuals, and communities.

Human Services
11
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
12
The Thresholds

Thresholds provides innovative behavioral and primary healthcare that promotes empowerment, well-being, and full participation in community life. through unwavering community-based engagement, support, and advocacy, thresholds helps people…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treehouse and the most unlike its peers is XChange Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHW — $708,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHWTREEHOUSE — $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSE+1 more — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $180,000 · EducationOREGON HEAL…MINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC — $130,000 · OtherMINDS MATTE…BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $25,000 · OtherBLANCHET HO…ONE VET AT A TIME — $15,000 · OtherONE VET AT …ROYAL RIDGES RETREAT — $10,000 · OtherROYAL RIDGE…YOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER — $105,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE CLARK COUNTY FAIR — $83,461 · Arts & CultureDONATE LIFE NORTHWEST — $45,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $19,250 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthXChange Recovery — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBLACKPEARL FRIESIANS — $7,000 · Animals
Youth Development$1,073,000Education$180,000Other$180,000Food & Nutrition$105,000Arts & Culture$83,461Health$65,250Housing & Shelter$10,000Animals$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHW — $708,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $350,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC — $130,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetYOUTH EFFORTS AGAINST HUNGER — $105,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CLARK COUNTY FAIR — $83,461 over 2y, 72% of budgetDONATE LIFE NORTHWEST — $45,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $19,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER NATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetROYAL RIDGES RETREAT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetXChange Recovery — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLACKPEARL FRIESIANS — $7,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Theodore C and Katherine P Bentley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Theodore C and Katherine P Bentley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Theodore C and Katherine P Bentley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph