Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

ThedaCare Inc

To provide the highest quality health care, delivered in the most efficient and cost-effective ways, and accessible to all members of the community.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$8.7MPhilanthropy$738kHuman Services$306kYouth Development$251kEducation$136kEnvironment$25kCommunity Improvement$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THEDACARE FAMILY OF FOUNDATIONS INC$1,139,360
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$45,000
NEW MENTAL HEALTH CONNECTIONS$10,155
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF THE FOX CITIES: $94k → 7%YMCA: $93k → 7%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $150k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.0M · 7 repeat orgs$583k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$9.0M
$528k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
0%

Still filing today

86%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    ThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8.4M · revenue +74% · 46% of their budget
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE FOX CITIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $187k · revenue +61%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $127k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
  • MF
    MOSAIC FAMILY HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +108%
  • PC
    PARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $74k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley

To provide effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives by administering charitable funds that distribute grants and scholarships to benefit the citizens of kane and kendall counties of illinois…

Philanthropy
2
Fox Communities Credit Union

We partner with our members, communities, and fox family to build stronger financial futures.

3
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
4
Fordland Clinic Inc

To improve the health of our wider rural community and to serve as the independent provider of choice by offering comprehensive healthcare services to all area residents without regard to insurance or income.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

6
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
7
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

8
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through meaningful relationships built on gratitude and philanthropy.

Health
9
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin Community Physicians Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
10
Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Philanthropy
11
Fox Cities Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

Fox cities chamber of commerce and industry, inc. is dedicated to developing, advancing, and promoting the economic, industrial, commerical, professional, cultural, and civic welfare of the fox cities area.

12
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Appleton Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc — $8,393,225 · PhilanthropyThedaCare Family of Foundations IncCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC — $611,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC+1 more — $126,612 · PhilanthropyYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE FOX CITIES — $186,925 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesRURAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $82,300 · OtherKIMBERLY HIGH SCHOOL — $50,349 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $45,000 · OtherFLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherGORDON BUBOLZ NATURE PRESERVE INC — $25,000 · OtherWAUSHARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGING SERVICES — $18,000 · OtherTHE CITY OF NEW LONDON — $10,200 · OtherNEW NORTH INC — $20,000 · Other+1 more — $7,295 · OtherMOSAIC FAMILY HEALTH INC — $75,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $74,263 · HealthTexas Hospital Association — $25,000 · HealthNEW MENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION INC — $10,155 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC — $101,375 · EmploymentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $63,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC — $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA — $15,150 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Education
Philanthropy$9,131,337Human Services$336,925Other$283,144Health$184,418Employment$101,375Youth Development$101,150Education$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc — $8,393,225 over 8y, 46% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC — $611,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE FOX CITIES — $186,925 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC — $126,612 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC — $101,375 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetRURAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $82,300 over 2y, 25% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY HEALTH INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $74,263 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $63,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTexas Hospital Association — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGORDON BUBOLZ NATURE PRESERVE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC — $23,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW NORTH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA — $15,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE APPLETON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $7,295 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Capital Credit Union · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · Mielke Family Foundation Inc · Fox Communities Credit Union · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · The Boldt Family Fund Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization ThedaCare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph