Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Zoglio-Culbertson Charitable Tr

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2026still arriving
2
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Religion$16kHousing & Shelter$10kAnimals$8kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$2kInternational$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH (FOOD PANTR$1,000
THE SICILIAN PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $500 → 16%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%KIDS COME FIRST-KEY WEST: $1k → 14%CANCER -FOUNDATION: $50 → 17%THE SICILIAN PROJECT: $1k → 8%ST MARTHAS MINIISTRY: $2k → 9%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $4k → 13%VIRGINIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%BENEVOLENT BASKETS: $2k → 6%SEEC RETARDED CITIZENS: $2k → 8%ST MARYS SOUP KITCHENS: $1k → 8%SURGEONS FOR SMILES: $1k → 11%WORCHESTER CO GOLD: $500 → 13%THE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $500 → 16%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $3k → 13%BENEVOLENT BASKETS: $2k → 6%ST MARYS SOUP KITCHENS: $1k → 8%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $2k → 13%BENEVOLENT BASKETS: $1k → 6%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $2k → 13%BENEVOLENT BASKETS: $700 → 6%METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $2k → 13%BENEVOLENT BASKETS: $500 → 6%METROPOLITAN CHURCH: $2k → 13%THE LIGHT HOUSE SHELTER: $3k → 6%KEY WEST WOMENS CL OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 13%THE LIGHT HOUSE SHELTER: $1k → 6%KEW WEST WILD LIFE CTR: $1k → 13%DARE TO CARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%KEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER: $1k → 13%HERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH (FOOD PANTR: $1k → 6%KEW WEST WILD LIFE CTR: $1k → 13%AACBF ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%KEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER: $1k → 13%LIGHT HOUSE SHELTER: $500 → 6%KEW WEST WILD LIFE CTR: $1k → 13%WOODLAND BEACH VOL FIRE DET: $1k → 13%KEW WEST WILD LIFE CTR: $500 → 13%SPCA - KEY WEST: $500 → 13%METROPOLITAN CHURCH: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 9 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$35k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+20%

Still filing today

22%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH
    5× · 2019–2023 · $13k
  • BB
    BENEVOLENT BASKETS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue -79%
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE SHELTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $5k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • KW
    KEY WEST WOMENS CL OPERATION SMILE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earthwide Surgical Foundation

To provide medical and surgical care to needful areas of the world by means of training, equipment and manpower.

Health
2
Operation Fistula

To provide access to surgical treatment to women with obstetric fistula. this mission is achieved by providing financial assistance to medical service providers in the developing world. with the organization's support, these medical…

International
3
World Surgical Foundation Inc

The foundation organizes volunteer teams of surgeons to participate in surgical missions around the world to provide healthcare to the world's poor and medically underserved nations regardless of color, religion or creed.

Health
4
Freedom From Fistula Foundation Us Inc

The freedom from fistula foundation (us) ("foundation")'s purpose is to help women in africa suffering from obstetric fistulas which are caused by prolonged, obstructed childbirth, and lack of access to preventative maternity care. the…

International
5
Free to Smile Foundation Inc

Free to smile foundation is dedicated to supporting and sustaining comprehensive, quality surgical and dental services to poor and under-privileged children and adolescents throughout the world. to this end, our volunteers and partner…

Health
6
Surgicorps International

Surgicorps international's mission is to provide free surgical procedures and medical care to people in need in developing countries. surgical and medical care includes, but not limited to, reconstructive surgery for the treatment of cleft…

International
7
International Surgical Foundation

Provides surgical and other medical services in impoverished communities in the caribbean and central america

—
8
Surgiwex Inc

Provide surgical education & instruments

International
9
Giving to Extremes

The organization's mission is to deliver surgical care to those in need. global surgical expedition is a medical charity that sends surgical teams to underserved nations around the world to deliver surgeries and change lives.

International
10
Alliance for Smiles International Inc

The mission of Alliance for Smiles, Inc (AfS) is to forever improve the lives of children and communities impacted by cleft and providing free comprehensive treatment, while building local capacity for long-term care. AFS does this by…

International
11
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
12
Worldwide Fistula Fund

Worldwide fistula fund protects and restores the health and dignity of the world's most vulnerable women by preventing and treating devastating childbirth injuries.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Key West Wildlife Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $12,500 · OtherMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHBENEVOLENT BASKETS INC: $5,200 · OtherBENEVOLENT BASKETS INCTHE LIGHT HOUSE SHELTER: $4,500 · OtherTHE LIGHT HOUSE SHELTERKEW WEST WILD LIFE CTR: $3,500 · OtherKEW WEST WILD LIFE CTRST MARYS SOUP KITCHENS: $2,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN CHURCH: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherK W WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $6,750 · Other+10 moreKEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationThe Sicilian Project: $1,000 · EducationThe Fistula Foundation: $1,000 · HealthDARE TO CARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthSURGEONS FOR SMILES INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International
Other$42,450Animals$2,000Education$2,000Health$2,000International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBENEVOLENT BASKETS INC: $5,200 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetKEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURGEONS FOR SMILES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARE TO CARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BENEVOLENT BASKETS INC ↗
  • Who funds KEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Sicilian Project ↗
  • Who funds SURGEONS FOR SMILES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Zoglio-Culbertson Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Zoglio-Culbertson Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zoglio-Culbertson Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph