Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Zoe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$443k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$863kHuman Services$302kArts & Culture$300kHousing & Shelter$198kHealth$177kAnimals$164kPublic Safety & Disaster$159kEnvironment$124kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $179k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$80,000
NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER$50,000
NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA$35,000
SAFE PASSAGE$16,000
DAKIN HUMANE SHELTER$15,000
TAPESTRY HEALTH$15,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
MANNA SOUP KITCHEN$14,000
TJ O'CONNOR ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER$13,000
FISHER HOME$12,000
CENTER FOR SELF-RELIANCE$12,000
CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FOUNDATION$12,000
NORTHAMPTON COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS$10,000
CENTER FOR NEW AMERICANS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $467k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $25k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $10k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $10k → 12%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $6k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $5k → 12%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $5k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $5k → 12%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $5k → 12%THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $5k → 17%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $3k → 17%RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES: $5k → 12%THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $3k → 17%THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $2k → 17%THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $2k → 17%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%HILLTOWN VILLAGE INC: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $65k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $50k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $45k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $40k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $35k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $35k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $30k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $25k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NY
MA
PA
CT
DE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 40 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
11

Total granted

$2.4M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+4%

Still filing today

57%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +133%
  • NS
    NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $340k · revenue +44%
  • SP
    SAFE PASSAGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $137k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • BARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +241%
  • WM
    WINTERTHUR MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • OR
    Ocean River Institute Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newton Community Service Centers Inc

Family access empowers and strengthens families and the community by providing programs that nurture child development, prevent trauma, promote effective parenting skills, and support working parents. for more than 117 years, family access…

—
2
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
3
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
4
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
5
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
The Opacum Land Trust Inc

The mission of opacum land trust is to engage communities in protecting the land, water, and wildlife in south-central massachusetts for the benefit of current and future generations.

Environment
8
Easton Area Neighborhood Centers Inc

Easton area neighborhood centers, inc. (eanc) is committed to providing an array of services that enhance the quality of life for low- and moderate-income residents of northampton county. through innovative programming, educational…

Human Services
9
North Central Mass Chamber of Commerce

To foster and improve the general economic conditions of the north central massacusetts area through promotional and educational efforts.

—
10
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
11
Northampton Community Television Inc

To serve as a model community access organization providing programming and educational opportunities to the community through all means technologically available.

Arts & Culture
12
Northern Berkshire Community Coalition Inc

Improvement in quality of life in northern berkshire county

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northampton Survival Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kestrel Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $410,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCSAFE PASSAGE INC: $137,000 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE INCWFCR NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC RADIO: $111,000 · OtherWFCR NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC RADIOCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FOUNDATION: $97,000 · OtherCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FOUNDATIONDAKIN HUMANE SHELTER: $87,000 · OtherDAKIN HUMANE SHELTERCENTER FOR SELF-RELIANCE: $76,000 · OtherTJ O'CONNOR ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $73,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS: $71,500 · OtherNATIONAL PRIORITIES PROJECT: $57,000 · OtherFISHER HOME: $55,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $62,000 · Other+27 more: $347,500 · Other+27 moreNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $340,000 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL …RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesRIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES …THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDAT…+3 more: $19,000 · Human ServicesNorthampton Community Music Center Inc: $63,000 · EducationTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCENTER FOR FURNITURE CRAFTSMANSHIP: $5,000 · EducationMANNA SOUP KITCHEN: $73,500 · Food & NutritionGROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC: $16,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $3,000 · Food & NutritionKESTREL LAND TRUST: $66,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $23,000 · EnvironmentOcean River Institute Inc: $5,000 · EnvironmentTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $90,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $9,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,584,000Human Services$469,000Education$103,000Food & Nutrition$97,500Environment$94,000Health$90,000Arts & Culture$75,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $410,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $340,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $137,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES INC: $76,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMANNA SOUP KITCHEN: $73,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetKESTREL LAND TRUST: $66,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNorthampton Community Music Center Inc: $63,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $62,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR NEW AMERICANS INC: $31,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPASCOMMUCK CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $30,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetHISTORIC NORTHAMPTON INC: $28,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSOLDIER ON INC: $26,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,500 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetGROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER: $15,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOcean River Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FURNITURE CRAFTSMANSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStone Soup Cafe Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHILLTOWN VILLAGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHAMPTON COMMUNITY ARTS TRUST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds KESTREL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Northampton Community Music Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NEW AMERICANS INC ↗
  • Who funds PASCOMMUCK CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC NORTHAMPTON INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIER ON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA55.8× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Mo and Cher Willems Foundation · United Way of the Franklin & Hampshire Region · Ro Family Foundation · The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Hurdle Hill Foundation · Shatz Schwartz and Fentin Charitable Foundation · Living Springs Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Zoe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Zoe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Soldier On Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Community Action Pioneer Valley: 62% of income from government
  • Riverside Industries Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Tapestry Health Systems Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Safe Passage Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Center for New Americans Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Stone Soup Cafe Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Grow Food Northampton Inc: 25% of income from government
  • The Treehouse Foundation Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Manna Soup Kitchen: 15% of income from government
  • Hilltown Village: 7% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New England Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue League of Boston: 0% of income from government
  • Historic Northampton Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zoe’s filings →

More from the funding graph