Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Zaffaroni Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of The Zaffaroni Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Zaffaroni Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $187k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
6
’18
6
’19
3
’20
2
’21
4
’22
1
’23
2
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.1MEnvironment$228kScience & Tech$100kEducation$84kArts & Culture$75kHealth$35kRecreation & Sports$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$100,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA$15,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$10,000
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY MEMBERSHIP SERVICES$2,500
MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC$2,500
UC REGENTS BERKELEY THE CAL ATHLETICS FUND$2,500
PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA$2,500
10000 DEGREES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $3k → 7%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $3k → 7%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+57%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +133%
  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +164%
  • AP
    ASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF MEDICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • GI
    GEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF WALDORF SCHOOLS OF NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

—
6
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
8
San Diego Historical Society

The mission of the san diego history center is to preserve our region's history - tell the diverse story of our region's past, present, and future; educate and enrich our community; and foster civic pride.

—
9
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc

Phipps' mission is to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants, to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research, and to celebrate its historic glasshouse.

Environment
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asante Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $1,131,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULAUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONPeninsula Open Space Trust (POST): $45,000 · OtherPeninsula Open Space Trust (…San Francisco Waldorf High School: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $72,000 · Other+13 moreSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · EducationPEACE HOUSE: $12,000 · Education10000 DEGREES: $3,000 · EducationPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $30,000 · EnvironmentASANTE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATION: $22,000 · Recreation & Sports
Youth Development$1,131,000Other$437,000Arts & Culture$45,000Education$33,000Environment$30,000Health$25,000Recreation & Sports$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $1,131,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE HOUSE: $12,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget10000 DEGREES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEACE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC ↗
  • Who funds GEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Zaffaroni Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Zaffaroni Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zaffaroni’s filings →

    More from the funding graph