Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Yasme Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$157kArts & Culture$54kYouth Development$51kRecreation & Sports$49kEducation$28kHealth$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$1,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Electronic Applications Radio Service$15,775
Radio Club de Provins$11,500
WWROF Inc$10,500
Contest University Inc$5,000
Elayi M Banda 7Q7EB$4,000
Kees Van Oosbree W0AAE$4,000
Andy Repetto ZD9BV$2,873
Roland Gafner HB9VQQ$2,000
Pacific Island DX Group$1,000
Individual grant recipient$796
Ethiopian Amateur Radio Society$671
Jeffrey Dahn Memorial Foundation$560
Eric P Nichols KL7AJ$500
John E Portune W6NBC$500
Edward Engleman KG8CX$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 67% of grant dollars ($268k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 33% that went abroad ($132k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Roland Gafner HB9VQQ: $2k → 10%Maranyundo Initiative: $1k → 8%Dokumentationsarchiv Funk: $3k → 17%Joe Eisenberg: $1k → 13%Dan Marler K7REX: $1k → 8%Contest University Inc: $5k → 13%Robert A Wilson: $1k → 8%Open Research Institute: $30k → 11%James W Brown: $1k → 13%Radio Amateur Society of Thailand: $3k → 9%Elayi M Banda 7Q7EB: $4k → 13%James Sarte: $1k → 17%WWROF Inc: $11k → 10%HacDC Amateur Radio Club: $2k → 14%Brett Ruiz: $1k → 15%Gordon Gibby KX4Z: $1k → 19%Kees Van Oosbree W0AAE: $4k → 17%Ushuaia Amateur Radio Club: $2k → 5%Jari Perkiomaki: $1k → 16%ARRL Foundation: $5k → 11%Pacific Island DX Group: $1k → 11%DX Engineering: $21k → 13%Ethiopian Amateur Radio Society: $5k → 6%JCM Logistics Inc: $5k → 6%Foundation for Amateur Radio: $5k → 6%Foundation for Amateur Radio: $5k → 11%Electronic Applications Radio Service: $16k → 7%Duffy Technology Foundation: $5k → 13%WWROF Inc: $8k → 10%Algerian Amateur Radio Society: $4k → 15%ARRL Foundation: $5k → 11%DX Engineering: $8k → 13%Ethiopian Amateur Radio Club: $4k → 6%Foundation for Amateur Radio: $5k → 6%Electronic Applications Radio Service: $8k → 7%Contest University Inc: $5k → 13%WWROF Inc: $8k → 10%ARRL Foundation: $5k → 11%Andy Repetto ZD9BV: $3k → 6%Foundation for Amateur Radio: $5k → 6%Electronic Applications Radio Service: $5k → 7%Contest University: $5k → 13%ARRL Foundation: $5k → 11%Ethiopian Amateur Radio Club: $2k → 6%Foundation for Amateur Radio: $5k → 6%ARRL Foundation: $5k → 11%Algerian Amateur Radio Club: $1k → 6%Ethiopian Amateur Radio Society: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 33% of all-years giving ($132k)

14 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$68k · 17 grants
Czechia$14k · 2 grants
France$12k · 1 grant
Tunisia$8k · 2 grants
Singapore$7k · 2 grants
Ethiopia$7k · 3 grants
Finland$3k · 3 grants
Austria$3k · 1 grant
Thailand$3k · 1 grant
Croatia$3k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Yasme Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Yasme Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 37% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 11 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +207% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
55

Total granted

$214k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+207%
+5%

Still filing today

18%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationScience & TechPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    Ottawa Amateur Radio Club Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $39k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2022 · $29k
  • EA
    ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS RADIO SERVICE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k

Funded once

  • OR
    OPEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -98%
  • VI
    Virgin Islands Amateur Repeater Gro
    one grant, 2021 · $28k
  • CR
    Czech Radio Club
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ottawa Amateur Radio Club Inc: $39,000 · OtherOttawa Amateur Radio Club IncIndividual grant recipient: $29,018 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS RADIO SERVICE: $28,275 · OtherELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS RADIO SERVICEVirgin Islands Amateur Repeater Gro: $27,955 · OtherVirgin Islands Amateur Repeater GroWWROF Inc: $25,500 · OtherWWROF IncFOUNDATION FOR AMATEUR RADIO INC: $25,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR AMATEUR RADIO INCCONTEST UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · OtherSeychelles Amateur Radio Associatio: $12,090 · OtherRadio Club de Provins: $11,500 · Other+66 more: $129,713 · Other+66 moreOPEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · Science & TechARRL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC: $1,080 · EducationUniversity of Scranton: $796 · Education
Other$343,051Science & Tech$30,000Philanthropy$25,000Education$1,876

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMATEUR RADIO INC: $25,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetARRL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC: $1,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC ISLAND DXPEDITION GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $796 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AMATEUR RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds ARRL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amateur Radio Digital CommunicationsCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amateur Radio Digital Communications · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Yasme Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Yasme Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 85%
  • The Maranyundo Initiative Inc: 85% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Yasme Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Yasme Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yasme’s filings →

More from the funding graph