Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wolf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0160% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$873kReligion$368kHousing & Shelter$53kYouth Development$6kArts & Culture$5kHealth$1kHuman Services$1kRecreation & Sports$400Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,304
Median grant
1
States reached
$493k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD$10,304
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WE ARE YOUR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 29 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
44

Total granted

$1.9M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+121%

Still filing today

7%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $860k · revenue ×12
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2021 · $410k
  • S4
    SHTIBEL 45 INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $131k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mikvah Ltd
Philanthropy
2
Mchon Kisvei R Elya Boruch Inc

To publish and disseminate the torah lectures of rabbi elya boruch finkel of blessed memory.

Religion
3
Machon Pri Eitz Chaim Inc

To support the furtherance of torah study, including the publication of new torah works.

Religion
4
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
5
Beth Medrash Govoha of New York Inc

Jewish education & development

Religion
6
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
7
Bnei Baruch America Inc

Sharing the wisdom of kabbalah with the world.

Religion
8
Me'ohr Bais Yaakov Inc

To support schools of religious studies.

Religion
9
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

—
11
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
12
Machon Basya Rochel Inc

To support charitable organization through investment income

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mikvah Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bty Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $859,606 · OtherPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTDIndividual grant recipient: $409,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHTIBEL 45 INC: $131,000 · OtherSHTIBEL 45 INCIndividual grant recipient: $101,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $98,365 · Other+61 more: $494,502 · Other+61 moreBTY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $360 · ReligionREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $1,000 · HealthKAPAYIM INC: $100 · HealthWe Are Your Children Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesMACHON MASEH ROCKEACH INC: $500 · Arts & CultureBNOT CHAYA ACADEMY CORP: $300 · Education
Other$2,094,673Religion$4,360Health$1,100Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$500Education$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $859,606 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBTY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCamp Zichron Zvi Dovid Inc: $2,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWe Are Your Children Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMACHON MASEH ROCKEACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOT CHAYA ACADEMY CORP: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD ↗
  • Who funds BTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Zichron Zvi Dovid Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY30× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc · Lcpv Foundation Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Mazal Charitable Trust · M & M Fischer Foundation · Blum Foundation · Hf Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wolf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wolf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wolf Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph