Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wing 2 Wing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$875k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.1MPhilanthropy$875kHousing & Shelter$250kArts & Culture$160kHuman Services$110kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$48,257
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES$875,393
Individual grant recipient$250,000
LIBERA INC$100,000
Individual grant recipient$48,257
HIGH Q FOUNDATION$5,000
MARION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$2,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIBERA INC: $100k → 19%GOLDEN GIRL GROUP HOME: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 3 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +201% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$595k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+201%
+63%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +201%
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +9%
  • HQ
    HIGH Q FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $36k

Funded once

  • W
    WORLDREADERORG
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -82%
  • CD
    COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +228%
  • HM
    Harvey Mudd Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Wiley College

Provide a liberal arts education with globally focused endeavors to provide an intellectually stimulating environment, promoting student competencies in communication, as well as critical and analytical thinking.

Education
8
Marshall University Research Corporation

Charitable education and scientific research

Community Improvement
9
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
10
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Goucher College

Goucher College provides an innovative liberal arts education that prepares students with a broad, humane perspective for a life of inquiry, creativity, and critical and analytical thinking. The College's vision is to become a top-100…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Worldreaderorg; the most unlike its peers is Coalfield Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,824,392 · EducationMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED+1 more: $25,000 · EducationMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $875,393 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,257 · Other+3 more: $48,000 · OtherWORLDREADERORG: $300,000 · InternationalCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureLibera Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN GIRL INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$1,849,392Other$1,221,650International$300,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Arts & Culture$150,000Human Services$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,824,392 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWORLDREADERORG: $300,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $150,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetLibera Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GIRL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wing 2 Wing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wing 2 Wing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wing 2 Wing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph