Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William W & Anna Louise Young Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$80kArts & Culture$43kPhilanthropy$28kYouth Development$22kCivil Rights$13kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD$7,200
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PROPEL INC$2,000
HARID CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$2,000
ROHR BAIS CHAYA ACADEMY$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IN JACOBS SHOES: $1k → 13%IN JACOBS SHOES: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 12 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$227k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+34%

Still filing today

33%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HARID CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +111%
  • PI
    PROPEL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +317%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +33%
  • J
    JAFCO
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • GA
    GERMANIC ALLIANCE OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
2
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
3
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

—
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
7
Kesher Ld Inc Kesher

To provide, and guide other schools in providing, an education in both jewish and secular studies that meet the needs of the invididual student, and which empowers each student to reach his/her highest level of independent and…

Education
8
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
9
Holocaust Documentation and Education Center Inc

The center's primary mission is to preserve, protect and perpetuate the authentic memory of the holocaust, by creating a permanent and irrefutable record of the testimonies of survivors, liberators and rescuers. the holocaust center…

Arts & Culture
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
12
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCH: $68,500 · OtherALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $29,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $20,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD: $7,200 · Other+11 more: $27,440 · Other+11 moreHARID CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $43,000 · Arts & CultureHARID CONSERVATORY …PROPEL INC: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROPEL INCANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $11,000 · Civil RightsTHE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $250 · Health
Other$169,040Arts & Culture$43,000Youth Development$22,000Civil Rights$11,000Human Services$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARID CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $43,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPROPEL INC: $22,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARID CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PROPEL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
  • Who funds THE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William W & Anna Louise Young Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William W & Anna Louise Young Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The William W & Anna Louise Young Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The William W & Anna Louise Young Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William W & Anna Louise Young’s filings →

    More from the funding graph