Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William D and Agnes H Helmuth Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of THE WILLIAM D AND AGNES H HELMUTH PRIVATE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$708k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCLEOD MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY$5,000
AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC$4,500
H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR FDN$4,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY E POLK$3,500
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$3,000
TURKEY CREEK ASSEMBLY OF GOD$3,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF POLK COUNTY$2,500
WOMEN'S CARE CTR OF BARTOW$2,500
SPCA FLORIDA$2,500
CHURCH SERVICE CENTER$2,500
GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $5k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $5k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $5k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $5k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $3k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $3k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $3k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $3k → 16%VOLUNTEERS IN SVC TO THE ELDERLY: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$509k · 14 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$509k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+59%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +61%
  • VI
    VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +149%
  • GS
    Good Shepherd Hospice Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SU
    SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +59%
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
2
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
3
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
4
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
5
Florida Chapter American College of Cardiology

Providing information on advances in cardiology

6
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…

8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Wake County Inc

Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…

Animals
9
The Hospice Institute of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice institute is now inactive.

10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
11
Baptist Health Medical Group Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist health medical group inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist…

Health
12
Hernando Pasco Hospice Inc

Hernando Pasco Hospice, Inc. provides hospice services that relieve the suffering of persons residing in its communities affected by life-limiting illnesses and end-of-life issues so all may live as fully and comfortably as possible.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers in Service to the Elderly Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MCLEOD MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $132,000 · OtherMCLEOD MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAMERICAN RED CROSS — $47,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR FDN — $36,000 · OtherH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR FDNHABITAT FOR HUMANITY E POLK — $27,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY E POLKCHURCH SERVICE CENTER INC — $24,500 · OtherCHURCH SERVICE CENTER INCTURKEY CREEK ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $24,000 · OtherTURKEY CREEK ASSEMBLY OF GODARTHRITIS FOUNDATION — $23,500 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATION+1 more — $2,000 · OtherAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $36,500 · HealthAMERICAN PARKINSON DI…Good Shepherd Hospice Inc — $30,000 · HealthGood Shepherd Hospice…American Heart Association Inc — $27,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Associ…+1 more — $3,000 · HealthTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POLK COUNTY INC — $20,500 · AnimalsSPCA INC — $18,500 · AnimalsVOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS CARE CENTER OF BARTOW INC — $26,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 · Education
Other$316,500Health$97,000Animals$39,000Human Services$35,000Community Improvement$26,000Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $36,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC — $35,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGood Shepherd Hospice Inc — $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $27,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS CARE CENTER OF BARTOW INC — $26,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetCHURCH SERVICE CENTER INC — $24,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POLK COUNTY INC — $20,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSPCA INC — $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Hospice Inc
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds WOMENS CARE CENTER OF BARTOW INC
  • Who funds CHURCH SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POLK COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SPCA INC
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Central Florida IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Central Florida Inc · Givewell Community Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William D and Agnes H Helmuth Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Spca Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The William D and Agnes H Helmuth Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The William D and Agnes H Helmuth Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph