Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William and Cathy Kwapil Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$55k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The William and Cathy Kwapil Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Watertown Area Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The William and Cathy Kwapil Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $285k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Human Services$142kArts & Culture$90kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$45kAnimals$20kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$10kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WATERTOWN HIGH SCHOOL$55,000
YMCA$50,000
CORNERSTONE OF GRACE$32,400
WATERTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
WATERTOWN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL$20,000
WATERTOWN HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
1ST BRIGADE BAND$10,000
ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000
WATERTOWN YOUTH BASEBALL$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
WATERTOWN MAIN STREET PROGRAM$5,000
BUCKETS FOR HUNGER$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%CORNERSTONE OF GRACE: $32k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Watertown Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Watertown Area Chamber of Commerce is to connect members with one another and provide resources that foster growth and sustainability.

2
Watertown Community Foundation Inc

The foundation commenced operations on december 29, 2003. the foundation has been organized to support educational and other non-profit organizations in the town of watertown.

Philanthropy
3
Waterbury Development Corporation

To stimulate and support economic and housing development within the communities of the city of waterbury.

Community Improvement
4
Watertown Urban Mission

To serve the community, jointly and ecumenically, in such a way as to make the compassion and reconciling purpose of god felt wherever there is human need.

Human Services
5
Watertown Cares Inc

Providing a pathway out of homelessness

Housing & Shelter
6
Watertown Development Company

Economic development in the watertown, south dakota area.

7
Watertown Historical Society Inc

The primary goal of the society is to preserve watertown history and to strengthen the community's connection to teh past, to each other & to the future.

8
Watertown Area Cares Clinic Inc

We strive toward providing improved access to healthcare in the watertown area, with a focus on identifying populations that are in need and the available resources. we will coordinate the compassion and caring of the people of our area to…

9
Watertown Area Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Watertown Area Community Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Watertown Area United Way Inc

To assist in meeting human care needs of watertown area residents.

Philanthropy
12
Watertown Christian School

Developing within each child the character of christ in a challenging educational environment based on a biblical world view.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Watertown Area Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Buckets for Hunger Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YMCA — $100,000 · OtherYMCAWATERTOWN HIGH SCHOOL — $55,000 · OtherWATERTOWN HIGH SCHOOLWATERTOWN EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherWATERTOWN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONWATERTOWN YOUTH BASEBALL — $10,000 · Other1ST BRIGADE BAND — $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $8,000 · OtherWATERTOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyWATERTOWN AREA…Cornerstone of Grace — $32,400 · Human ServicesCornersto…Watertown Historical Society — $25,000 · Public BenefitWATERTOWN HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $20,000 · EducationROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $10,000 · Health
Other$228,000Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$32,400Public Benefit$25,000Animals$20,000Education$20,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATERTOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCornerstone of Grace — $32,400 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetWatertown Historical Society — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWATERTOWN HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBUCKETS FOR HUNGER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joseph and Sharon Darcey FoundationWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joseph and Sharon Darcey Foundation · Earl and Eugenia Quirk Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William and Cathy Kwapil Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph