Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wildwood Foundation Pnc Bank Na - Successor Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$36kPhilanthropy$32kEnvironment$28kReligion$21kEducation$21kHealth$19kArts & Culture$7kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLEVOIX CNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDAT$5,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$2,500
CUMBERLAND HEIGHTS$2,500
GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES$2,000
CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDENS$2,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NASHVILE$2,000
ST MARK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,500
PAUL'S PLACE AT ST PAUL'S$1,500
THE PORCH WRITERS' COLLECTIVE$1,500
SADDLE UP$1,500
NASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION$1,500
MAGDALENE INC - THISTLE FARMS$1,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF ST CECILIA$1,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $500 → 15%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES - MOMS AND TOTS CENTER: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES - MOMS AND TOTS CENTER: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES - MOMS AND TOTS CENTER: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 18 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$128k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+161%

Still filing today

28%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +35%
  • SU
    SADDLE UP
    7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +209%
  • NT
    NASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • TH
    THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +161%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Thomas University

Thomas university is an independent, not for profit, institution of higher education with undergraduate and graduate programs that prepare students for successful careers and responsible citizenship in a rapidly changing and complex world.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Pines of Sarasota Foundation Inc

Pines of sarasota foundation secures funding to provide compassionate care, vital resources, and financial assistance for the seniors, children, and the nursing community serving them.

Health
6
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
7
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
8
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

—
9
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
10
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Porch Writers Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUMBERLAND HEIGHTS: $14,500 · OtherCUMBERLAND HEIGHTSNASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION: $13,000 · OtherNASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATIONCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDENS: $12,500 · OtherCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDENSST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,100 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCHDOMINICAN SISTERS OF ST CECILIA CONGREGATION: $5,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF ST CECILIA CONGREGATIONMAGDELINE INC - THISTLE FARMS: $5,000 · OtherMAGDELINE INC - THISTLE FARMSCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NASHVILE: $4,000 · OtherMAGDELINE INC: $4,000 · OtherABE'S GARDEN COMMUNITY: $4,000 · OtherMOMS AND TOTS CENTER: $4,000 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherPAUL'S PLACE AT ST PAUL'S: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $7,500 · Other+4 moreCharlevoix County Community Foundation: $35,000 · PhilanthropyCharlevoix County Commun…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $2,300 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION…HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $17,500 · EducationHOLLINS UNI…SADDLE UP: $13,500 · HealthSADDLE UPFRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED: $1,000 · HealthFRONTIER …GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $500 · Human ServicesTHE PORCH WRITERS COLLECTIVE INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$89,600Philanthropy$37,300Education$17,500Health$14,500Human Services$10,500Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCharlevoix County Community Foundation: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLE UP: $13,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PORCH WRITERS COLLECTIVE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Charlevoix County Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SADDLE UP ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PORCH WRITERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wildwood Foundation Pnc Bank Na - Successor Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wildwood Foundation Pnc Bank Na - Successor Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wildwood Foundation Pnc Bank Na - Successor Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph