Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wieder Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$459kInternational$141kEducation$79kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$8kCrime & Legal$7kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$680Other$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLAND$38,830
BAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM$22,064
KEHILAS BAIS YISROEL$11,500
YESHIVA PE'ER HATORAH$10,400
BINYAN YERUSHALAIM$10,000
YESHIVATH GESHER$10,000
KHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV$7,840
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TORAH ACADEMY for GIRLS$4,390
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM S$3,500
CONG WOSIKIN HAMEZUYONIM INC$3,500
CONG TOLDOS AVRUHAM YITZCHOK$2,500
AGUDAS ACHIM OF LAWRENCE$2,450
L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC$2,360
BAIS HAMEDRASH YESHIVAS ISRAEL INC$2,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $3k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $100 → 6%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $2k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $2k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $1k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $1k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%L'MAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $360 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 51 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
47

Total granted

$611k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+9%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM
    4× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +47%
  • YG
    YESHIVATH GESHER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • OC
    Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc
    2× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONG AHAVAS TZADOKAH VCHESED
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • YL
    YAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROEL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • LB
    LEV BEREL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
11
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
12
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Unity Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLAND: $134,640 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLANDKHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV INC: $67,591 · OtherKHAL BNEI AVROHOM YAAKOV INCYESHIVA PE'ER HATORAH1: $56,380 · OtherYESHIVA PE'ER HATORAH1KEHILAS BAIS YISROEL: $32,470 · OtherKEHILAS BAIS YISROELYESHIVA PEER HATORAH INC: $31,920 · OtherYESHIVA PEER HATORAH INCIndividual grant recipient: $19,210 · Other+79 more: $228,380 · Other+79 moreBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $79,564 · EducationBAIS YAAKOV A…+6 more: $2,718 · EducationYESHIVATH GESHER: $20,000 · ReligionLEV BEREL INC: $9,000 · ReligionENKAS USIR INC: $1,610 · Religion+2 more: $1,330 · ReligionLMAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $7,970 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $3,100 · Human ServicesTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $2,740 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,210 · PhilanthropyKOLLEL KLAL CHARITY AND EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,830 · PhilanthropyOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $500 · PhilanthropyCHAIM MEIR CAMP FUND: $180 · Philanthropy+2 more: $200 · PhilanthropyMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $1,080 · InternationalCHASDEI DEVORAH INC: $623 · International
Other$570,591Education$82,282Religion$31,940Human Services$14,910Philanthropy$4,920Arts & Culture$2,500International$1,703

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $79,564 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVATH GESHER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLMAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC: $7,970 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetMA'AYNEI HAYESHUA TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,210 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL KLAL CHARITY AND EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,830 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetENKAS USIR INC: $1,610 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $1,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF SULLIVAN AND ULSTER COUNTIES INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMeorot Trust: $860 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI DEVORAH INC: $623 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI SARA TOYBA INC: $610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND BIKE CHALLENGE INC: $600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITY WARRIORS INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlatbush Shomrim Safety Patrol Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEVI YITZCHAK FAMILY CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEIR CAMP FUND: $180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Acheinu Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVATH GESHER ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds LMAAN YERUSHALAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds MA'AYNEI HAYESHUA TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY55.9× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Basch Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Bcg Charitable Foundation · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Freund Family Foundation The

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wieder Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wieder Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wieder Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph