Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Werth Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$716k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$5.0MEducation$1.3MHealth$1.1MFood & Nutrition$706kArts & Culture$542kHousing & Shelter$401kEnvironment$233kYouth Development$97kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $266k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $405k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBUS HOUSE$100,000
GAYLORD HOSPITAL 1 OF 2$75,000
CT FOODSHARE$75,000
HIMALAYA CURRENTS$55,000
MASSARO COMMUNITY FARM$50,000
WOMENS HEALTH AT YALE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
GATHER NEW HAVEN$35,000
CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER$30,000
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS$30,000
AMERICARES CA WILFIRES$25,000
HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$23,000
ELM SHAKESPEARE 2 OF 3$17,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HARTFORD CITY MISSION: $1k → 11%HARTFORD CITY MISSION: $1k → 11%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $10k → 9%HARTFORD CITY MISSION: $1k → 11%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $10k → 9%HARTFORD CITY MISSION: $1k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER HARTFORD: $1k → 11%CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER HARTFORD: $1k → 11%GIFTS OF LOVE: $1k → 11%GIFTS OF LOVE: $1k → 11%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $1k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $1k → 9%HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 47 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
98

Total granted

$3.1M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COLUMBUS HOUSE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +7%
  • GH
    Gaylord Hospital INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +14%
  • MC
    MASSARO COMMUNITY FARM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAVE THE SOUND SCSU
    one grant, 2024 · $136k
  • SL
    SW Light House Beacon Point Preservation
    one grant, 2017 · $132k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
5
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
6
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
8
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy
9
Hartford Preservation Alliance Inc

Hartford Preservation Alliance's primary mission is to preserve and revitalize Hartford's unique architectural heritage and neighborhood character.

Arts & Culture
10
Mill River Collaborative Inc

Our mission is to run a world-class urban park in the heart of stamford that serves as both an oasis in city life and a vibrant, diverse, green-space that inspires sound environmental practices and learning.

Recreation & Sports
11
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
12
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Ecology Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Himalaya Currents Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCSU Foundation: $900,000 · OtherSCSU FoundationCT FOODSHARE: $300,000 · OtherCT FOODSHAREYALE WOMENS HEALTH: $150,000 · OtherSAVE THE SOUND SCSU: $135,967 · Other+130 more: $2,505,409 · Other+130 moreHIMALAYA CURRENTS INC: $220,000 · HealthHIMALAYA …Gaylord Hospital INC: $200,000 · HealthGaylord H…BRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $1,200 · HealthCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterMASSARO COMMUNITY FARM INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNeighborhood Studios of Fairfield County Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureA Broken Umbrella Theatre Inc: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $4,800 · Arts & CultureHOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC): $60,000 · EnvironmentFARMINGTON RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUND: $17,000 · Environment+3 more: $12,000 · EnvironmentMERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $90,000 · Education+1 more: $1,200 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC: $7,200 · Human ServicesHARTFORD CITY MISSION INC: $4,800 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $2,400 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $2,400 · Human Services+1 more: $1,200 · Human Services
Other$3,991,376Health$441,200Housing & Shelter$300,000Arts & Culture$284,800Environment$184,000Education$91,200Human Services$48,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSE INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHIMALAYA CURRENTS INC: $220,000 over 4y, 96% of budgetGaylord Hospital INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMASSARO COMMUNITY FARM INC: $200,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC): $60,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES HEALTHCARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood Studios of Fairfield County Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFARMINGTON RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $17,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERIOR AIDS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMSBURY LAND TRUST INC: $4,800 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHARTFORD CITY MISSION INC: $4,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCREATIVE ARTS WORKSHOP INC: $4,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSALT PONDS COALITION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCharlestown Land Trust: $3,600 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWOODBRIDGE PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $3,600 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetSIMSBURY ABC PROGRAM INC: $3,600 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMONROE PLAYGROUND FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GET IN TOUCH FOUNDATIONINC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYA CURRENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Gaylord Hospital INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSARO COMMUNITY FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC) ↗
  • Who funds ART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundation IncCT23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Peoples United Community Foundation · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Ethel & Abe Lapides Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Jane and William Curran Foundation Inc C/O Margaret Andreassi · Jewish Foundation of Greater New Haven Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Werth Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Werth Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Columbus House Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Farmington River Watershed Association Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Bridges Healthcare Inc: 67% of income from government
  • The Center for Family Justice Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Housatonic Valley Association Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Human Services Council Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Massaro Community Farm Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Art Council of Greater New Haven Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc): 11% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Gaylord Hospital Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Studios of Fairfield County Inc: 3% of income from government
  • A Broken Umbrella Theatre Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Healing Meals Foundation Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Werth Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Werth Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Werth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph