Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Werner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.3MEducation$2.0MReligion$1.8MYouth Development$850kRecreation & Sports$525kHuman Services$328kArts & Culture$325kInternational$288kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $492k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $716k
$25,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YALE UNIVERSITY$125,000
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE$100,681
SHALOM AUSTIN$100,000
AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS$100,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$75,000
FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$65,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$50,000
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$50,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$50,000
THE WOMEN'S ALZHEIMER'S MOVEMENT$40,000
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$40,000
THE CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION$30,000
PELOTONIA$30,000
DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$30,000
LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669: $5k → 16%Djcc Development Corporation: $70k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%DJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $70k → 10%DJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $40k → 10%THE EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%GRIEFHAVEN: $3k → 14%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%GRIEFHAVEN: $3k → 14%GRIEFHAVEN: $3k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE: $20k → 17%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 14%southern california counseling center: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.8M · 48 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
51

Total granted

$9.8M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+19%

Still filing today

81%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +162%
  • THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $835k · revenue +39%
  • AA
    AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $740k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +34%
  • HB
    HOME BASE RED SOX FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANUEL
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
11
The Waldorf School Inc

The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Museum; the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/74
Grantees still filing
50/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $1,518,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLEAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $740,000 · OtherAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARSMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $450,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALYALE UNIVERSITY: $255,000 · OtherHOME BASE RED SOX FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherPLOUGHSHARES FUND: $220,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL: $200,000 · OtherCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 · Other+52 more: $1,250,200 · Other+52 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,047,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institu…Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $205,000 · HealthFroedtert Hospital Foundat…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WIS…CLAREMATRIX: $130,000 · Health+7 more: $113,500 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $835,124 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SCHO…CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $205,000 · EducationCROSSROADS SCHOOL F…ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $200,000 · EducationST ANDREW'S EPISCOP…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $110,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYPELOTONIA: $100,000 · EducationLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $80,000 · EducationSPRUCE STREET NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $70,000 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $70,000 · EducationMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $67,500 · Education+10 more: $217,501 · Education+10 moreTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropySHALOM AUSTIN: $215,000 · PhilanthropyPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $17,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION: $454,950 · Recreation & SportsWHITEFISH BAY JR DUKES BASEBALL CLUB INC: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $45,000 · Arts & CultureBraddock Carnegie Library Assoc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureBETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $12,500 · Arts & CultureDJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $180,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Everychild Foundation: $16,000 · Human ServicesThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation: $9,000 · Human Services+4 more: $19,500 · Human Services
Other$5,098,200Health$2,640,500Education$1,955,125Philanthropy$507,000Recreation & Sports$479,950Arts & Culture$255,000Human Services$244,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,047,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $835,124 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $740,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION: $454,950 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSHALOM AUSTIN: $215,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $205,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $205,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $200,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $180,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLAREMATRIX: $130,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSPRUCE STREET NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $70,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $67,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $60,001 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $51,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $29,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBraddock Carnegie Library Assoc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITEFISH BAY JR DUKES BASEBALL CLUB INC: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DJCC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRUCE STREET NURSERY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ralph Evinrude Foundation IncWI26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Gardner Foundation · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Anon Charitable Trust · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Charter Manufacturing Company Foundation Inc · Telly Foundation Ltd

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Werner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Werner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England: 2% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Childrens Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Werner Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Werner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Werner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph