Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Waters Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$66kReligion$49kYouth Development$12kAnimals$10kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$304
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIDEON RESCUE MISSION$10,000
SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA WRESTLING ACADEMY$5,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$3,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,500
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ST MARY'S CHURCH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GO FUND ME HELP$525
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION$500
PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT$500
UT SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADOPTTOGETHERORG: $3k → 6%JOYCE HOUSE INC: $5k → 16%ARDMORE DAY NURSERY: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
OH
CA
UT
AZ
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 4 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
20

Total granted

$97k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+6%

Still filing today

25%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S CHURCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k
  • OU
    OUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • FK
    FUNDAMENTAL KIDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carole's House of Hope

Caroles House of Hope provides transitional living for young women and mothers who have aged out of foster care or have become homeless. Our home-like environment, paired with innovative programs and services, encourages self-sufficiency…

Public Benefit
2
Ardmore Habitat for Humanity Inc

To build houses for people in need and to give them a stepping stone to a better life.

Housing & Shelter
3
A Bridge to Opportunity Inc

To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault

Housing & Shelter
4
Job Haines Home for Aged People
—
5
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
6
Bethany House Abuse Shelter Inc

Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.

Human Services
7
Opportunity House Inc

Provide a homelike atmosphere to help change the lives of drug and alcohol reliant individuals.

Human Services
8
Alco Halfway House

Provide housing and residential care for recovering alcoholic

—
9
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

—
10
Home for Homeless Women
—
11
Starting Over Inc

Led by formerly incarcerated people, we aim to eradicate poverty and incarceration, and in their place, create communities of care that support self-determination and keep families safe. We accomplish his mission through housing models,…

Housing & Shelter
12
180 Recovery House

Residential sober living house. assit men in overcoming addiction and reintergrating into society.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ardmore Beautification Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $55,050 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONST MARY'S CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherST MARY'S CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFUNDAMENTAL KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherFUNDAMENTAL KIDS FOUNDATIONGIDEON RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · OtherGIDEON RESCUE MISSION+22 more: $41,375 · Other+22 moreJOYCE HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesARDMORE DAY NURSERY INC: $500 · Human ServicesPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 · HealthARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL: $250 · Environment
Other$176,925Human Services$8,000Health$1,000Environment$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOYCE HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARDMORE DAY NURSERY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOYCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds OUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARDMORE DAY NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARDMORE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jerome Westheimer Family FoundationOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jerome Westheimer Family Foundation · The Daube Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Ardmore Inc · McCrory Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Waters Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Waters Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Waters Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Waters Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Waters Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph