Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wahoos Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$262kHousing & Shelter$180kInternational$35kReligion$33kHealth$28kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$20kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$929k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,475
THOMAS HOUSE FAMILY SHELTER$20,000
MedSend$10,000
Nature Conservancy$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
IRC$7,500
Ocean Cleanup$7,500
World Central Kitchen$7,500
Tzu-chi$5,000
Guide Dogs for the Blind$5,000
Priceless Pets$2,500
Somecares Soup Kitchen$2,000
Best Friends Animal Shelter$2,000
Apex Wolf Project$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $1k → 9%SUNSHINE DAY PROGRAM: $4k → 10%SUNSHINE DAY PROGRAM: $4k → 10%SUNSHINE DAY PROGRAM: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
NV
CA
UT
CO
VA
SC
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$532k · 17 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$532k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+35%

Still filing today

53%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalReligionHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +105%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +89%
  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MS
    Maui Strong Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • DR
    DENVER RESCUE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peace 4 Animals

Peace 4 animals animal welfare organization supports the conservation of endangered species worldwide. we work on campaigns to promote advocacy and education on how to protect wildlife in peril, as well as the preservation of their natural…

Animals
2
Happy Doggo

The organization will address the global street dog problem through sterilization, vaccination, critical medical care, and re-homing of sick, injured, and abused dogs.

Animals
3
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
4
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
7
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
11
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
12
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $227,378 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER — $155,400 · OtherTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTERPure Land Fund — $22,000 · Other+18 more — $81,960 · Other+18 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $27,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $7,500 · InternationalBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $32,500 · ReligionSUNSHINE DAY PROGRAM — $12,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $2,500 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,000 · AnimalsPRICELESS PUPPY RESCUE CORP — $4,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsPROJECT MEDSEND — $10,000 · EducationHOPE AND CARE OUTREACH — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · Health
Other$486,738International$34,500Religion$32,500Human Services$22,000Animals$12,000Education$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER — $155,400 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MEDSEND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE AND CARE OUTREACH — $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRICELESS PUPPY RESCUE CORP — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds SUNSHINE DAY PROGRAM
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds PROJECT MEDSEND
  • Who funds HOPE AND CARE OUTREACH
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PRICELESS PUPPY RESCUE CORP
  • Who funds SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wahoos Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph