Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

The Voter Participation Center

To increase civic engagement among under-represented communities including unmarried women, people of color, and young people.

$13M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2021
100%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$5,000,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$5,000,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 21
FY2020 to FY2021
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$20M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 100% of the organizations The Voter Participation Center funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$13M67%
FY20211$1.8M100%
FY202021$5.7Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$18MEducation$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.1MEnvironment$325k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
NC
DC
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Democracy Matters Foundation$5,000,000114%
Counteract Foundation$5,000,0001100%
Center for Voter Information$4,278,480256%
Working America Education Fund$1,800,000151%
Fair Fight Action Inc$1,500,00013%
Issue One$500,000110%
Momsrising Education Fund$400,00014%
The Alliance for Climate Protection$325,00012%
The Collective Education Fund$250,00015%
Barbara Jordan Institute$250,000195%
Show all 23 grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($20k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Voter Participation Center supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 23 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDemocracy Matters Foundation: $5,000,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCounteract Foundation: $5,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCenter for Voter Information: $4,278,480 over 2y, 56% of budgetWorking America Education Fund: $1,800,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetFair Fight Action Inc: $1,500,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetIssue One: $500,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMomsrising Education Fund: $400,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetThe Alliance for Climate Protection: $325,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Collective Education Fund: $250,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBarbara Jordan Institute: $250,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetVoteorg: $200,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOrganization of Chinese Americans of Greater Houston: $100,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetVoteamerica: $54,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Migrant Kitchen Incorporated: $44,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetState Voices: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetNew Georgia Project Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBvm Capacity Building Institute Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Civic Engagement Roundtable: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBlueprint North Carolina: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProject Home: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio Organizing Collaborative: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerica Votes: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Merle Chambers Fund · Hopewell Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Voter Participation Center with peer funders

About The Voter Participation Center

How much does The Voter Participation Center give?
The Voter Participation Center reported 3 grants totaling $12,500,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 21 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2021.
What does The Voter Participation Center fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (86%), Education (7%), Philanthropy (5%).
Who are The Voter Participation Center's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Democracy Matters Foundation ($5.0M), Counteract Foundation ($5.0M), Center for Voter Information ($4.3M).
Does The Voter Participation Center fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Voter Participation Center?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Tides Foundation, NEO Philanthropy Inc, New Venture Fund.
Where is The Voter Participation Center based?
The Voter Participation Center is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Voter Participation Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph