Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Vision Council

THE VISION COUNCIL's mission is to position members for success by promoting growth in the vision care industry through education, advocacy, research, consumer outreach, strategic relationship building and industry forums.

$118k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$3.1MScience & Tech$53kPublic Benefit$19kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $26,551 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $117,689 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,138 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPTICS & ELECTRO OPTIC STANDARDS COUNCIL$10,121
JOBSON MEDICAL INFORMATION LLC - WEBMD HEALTH CORP$10,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE$6,430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPTICS & ELECTRO OPTIC STANDARDS COUNCIL: $19k → 14%NEW YORK STATE OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION: $16k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE: $6k → 17%AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%OPTICIANS ASSN OF AMERICA: $8k → 17%GENYOUTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS: $9k → 11%THINK ABOUT YOUR EYES LLC: $3.0M → 9%OPTICS & ELECTRO OPTIC STANDARDS COUNCIL: $18k → 14%NEW YORK STATE OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE: $6k → 17%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS: $9k → 11%OPTICS & ELECTRO OPTIC STANDARDS COUNCIL: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE: $6k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L STANDARDS INST: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $55k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$55k · 100% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: ANNUAL FRIENDS OF VISION CONTRIBUTION · REFRACTIVE ERROR ADVOCACY CONTRIBUTION · PROJECT ASSISTANCE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

5%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$145k · 5 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$145k
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OPTICS AND ELECTRO OPTICS STANDARDS COUNCIL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $47k · revenue +19% · 27% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK STATE OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $26k · revenue +36%
  • AN
    AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TA
    THINK ABOUT YOUR EYES LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $3.0M
  • JM
    JOBSON MEDICAL INFORMATION LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • GI
    GenYOUTH Incorporated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THINK ABOUT YOUR EYES LLC — $3,000,000 · OtherTHINK ABOUT YOUR EYES LLC+8 more — $160,181 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE — $24,720 · Public BenefitGenYOUTH Incorporated — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,160,181Public Benefit$24,720Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPTICS AND ELECTRO OPTICS STANDARDS COUNCIL — $46,681 over 3y, 27% of budgetNEW YORK STATE OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION INC — $25,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE — $24,720 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS — $18,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Optometric Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPTICIANS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Vision Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph