Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Virginia and Paul Patti Fdtn Anthony W Graceffo Trustee

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$175kHealth$121kEmployment$100kHuman Services$61kYouth Development$45kPublic Benefit$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$300Animals$200Other$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COLUMBIANS$100,000
BLESSED TRINITY CHURCH$75,000
ST PETER'S RC CHURCH$75,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LODI$40,000
PARAMUS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$25,000
OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS RC CHURCH$25,000
HOLY NAME HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
OASIS$25,000
EVA'S VILLAGE$25,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND$25,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OASIS: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 4 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$140k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $46k · revenue +145%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LODI
    3× · 2017–2023 · $45k
  • EVA'S VILLAGE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $36k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +39%
  • SR
    SADDLE RIVER FIRE ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $300 · revenue -17%
  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2019 · $260 · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
2
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
3
Virginia Mason Medical Center

Virginia mason medical center's (the medical center) mission is to improve the health and well-being of the patients it services through the delivery of high quality, cost-effective care. the medical center provides integrated health…

Health
4
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
5
Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association

Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.

—
6
Rwj Barnabas Health Inc

Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…

Health
7
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
8
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Valley Home Care Inc

The mission of valley home care, which is part of the valley health system, is to support the integrated delivery of health and wellness programs to populations within our service area. valley home care responds to the changing health care…

Health
10
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
11
Valley Physician Services Inc

To provide management services to the following professional corporations: valley physician services, p.c. and valley physician services, ny, p.c.

Health
12
Evangelical Community Hospital

We provide exceptional healthcare, accessible to all, in the safest and most compassionate atmosphere possible. our vision: we will be our community's healthcare provider of choice by patients, physicians, and employees.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Valley Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Columbians Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBIANS INC: $100,000 · OtherCOLUMBIANS INCBLESSED TRINITY CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherBLESSED TRINITY CHURCHST PETER'S RC CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherST PETER'S RC CHURCHBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LODI: $45,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LODIPARAMUS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherPARAMUS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $25,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDOUR LADY OF THE ANGELS RC CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ANGELS RC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $14,200 · Other+3 more: $560 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL…HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL C…EVA'S VILLAGE INC: $35,500 · Community ImprovementOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSADDLE RIVER FIRE ASSOCIATION INC: $300 · Public Safety & DisasterNew Jersey Audubon Society: $200 · Environment
Other$384,760Health$95,500Community Improvement$35,500Human Services$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$300Environment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $35,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSADDLE RIVER FIRE ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Virginia and Paul Patti Fdtn Anthony W Graceffo Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Virginia and Paul Patti Fdtn Anthony W Graceffo Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia and Paul Patti Fdtn Anthony W Graceffo Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph