Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Village Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$51kEducation$28kRecreation & Sports$12kAnimals$10kPhilanthropy$6kYouth Development$4kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$778
Median grant
1
States reached
$790k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THEATRE ARTS FOR KIDS$6,530
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,430
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LINCOLN SOUTHWEST FBLA$900
Individual grant recipient$875
LINCOLN EAST FBLA$800
Individual grant recipient$778
HEARTLAND CONSERVATORY OF DANCE$700
WILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER$600
NEBRASKA HEALTHCARE ASSOCATION$476
HEARTLAND YOUTH BALLET$350
LINCOLN WARRIORS WRESTLING$280
OMAHA JCC DANCE PROGRAM$200
SMITTY'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF LINCOLN: $600 → 13%FRIENDSHIP HOME: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 23 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$105k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+80%

Still filing today

13%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THEATRE ART FOR KIDS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $36k · revenue +77%
  • FF
    FBLA--VARIOUS FBLA CHAPTERS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k

Funded once

  • PP
    PRICELESS PRETEEN PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +103%
  • LZ
    LINCOLN ZOO ADVENTURE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
2
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
3
Nebraska School Activities Association

To formulate and make policies which will cultivate high ideals of citizenship, fair competition, sportsmanship and teamwork which will compliment the member schools' curriculum programs.

Education
4
Nebraska Association for the Education of Young Children Inc

Promote professional development activities; advocate for issues relating to children and families; serve as a resource for local affiliates and for other agencies involved in working with and for children & families; disseminate…

Youth Development
5
Lincoln Area Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. activities include child care; youth development through a variety of youth sports, leadership programs and special needs…

—
6
Lincoln Total Community Action Inc

Early childhood development.

—
7
Nebraska State Education Association

The mission of the nebraska state education association is to advocate for all education professionals, emplowering them to provide an excellent public education for every student.

Employment
8
Omaha Theater Company

To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater, find their voices, and enrich their communities. theater is utilized as a tool in the educational and social development of young people to provide formal…

Arts & Culture
9
Lincolnshire Community Nursery School

Educational programs and services to preschool age children

—
10
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
11
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
12
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Lincoln; the most unlike its peers is Omaha Academy of Ballet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FBLA--VARIOUS FBLA CHAPTERS: $9,915 · OtherFBLA--VARIOUS FBLA CHAPTERSIndividual grant recipient: $8,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCK DANCE ACADEMY LINCOLN: $6,239 · OtherCK DANCE ACADEMY LINCOLNHEARTLAND CONSERVATORY OF DANCE: $5,978 · OtherHEARTLAND CONSERVATORY OF DANCEDECA--VARIOUS CHAPTERS: $5,040 · OtherDECA--VARIOUS CHAPTERSIndividual grant recipient: $4,020 · OtherPRICELESS PRETEEN PROGRAM: $3,500 · OtherCLUB HUSKERS: $3,070 · Other+49 more: $35,750 · Other+49 moreTHEATRE ART FOR KIDS: $36,425 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ART FOR KIDSLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $7,735 · AnimalsFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF LINCOLN: $600 · Human ServicesMONTESSORI SCHOOL FOR YOUNG CHILDRE: $1,030 · Education
Other$82,262Arts & Culture$36,425Animals$7,735Human Services$3,600Education$1,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHEATRE ART FOR KIDS: $36,425 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $7,735 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTESSORI SCHOOL FOR YOUNG CHILDRE: $1,030 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF LINCOLN: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION: $476 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA AQUATICS: $450 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOMAHA ACADEMY OF BALLET: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THEATRE ART FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTESSORI SCHOOL FOR YOUNG CHILDRE ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF LINCOLN ↗
  • Who funds WILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abel FoundationNE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abel Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Village Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Village Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Village Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Village Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Village’s filings →

    More from the funding graph