Skip to content

· Public charity

The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

$59M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$192MAnimals$2.1MHuman Services$529k
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 53 grants below total $56,692,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $58,781,048 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,089,048 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $390k
  • $250k+50 grants · $56M
$800,000
Median grant
26
States reached
$146M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$3,200,000
FRED HUTCH UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE CHILDRENS CANCER CONSORTIUM$3,100,000
DANA-FARBERHARVARD CANCER CENTER$2,800,000
UCLA HEALTH JONSSON COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$2,600,000
MONTEFIORE EINSTEIN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$2,400,000
DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE$2,255,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,000,000
YALE CANCER CENTER$1,800,000
ABRAMSON CANCER CENTER$1,600,000
THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION DBA MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,600,000
STANFORD CANCER INSTITUTE$1,600,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH$1,400,000
HAROLD C SIMMONS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$1,200,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IN ST LOUIS$1,200,000
UCSFHELEN DILLER FAMILY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$1,200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $1.0M → 14%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $900k → 22%STANFORD CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.6M → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $2.0M → 10%SALK CANCER CENTER - SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $1.0M → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $1.1M → 14%MONTEFIORE EINSTEIN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $2.4M → 28%HAROLD C SIMMONS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1.2M → 14%ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1.0M → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1.2M → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $1.2M → 8%WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE OF EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $1.2M → 10%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $1.4M → 12%PURDUE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $1.4M → 19%FRED HUTCH UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE CHILDRENS CANCER CONSORTIUM: $3.1M → 9%RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $1.3M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $1.0M → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IN ST LOUIS: $1.2M → 11%DUKE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER: $1.0M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $971k → 13%HUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.2M → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1.2M → 9%UCLA HEALTH JONSSON COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $2.6M → 14%UNC LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $900k → 13%DANA-FARBERHARVARD CANCER CENTER: $2.8M → 16%UCSFHELEN DILLER FAMILY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1.2M → 10%JONSSON COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1.3M → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2.0M → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $900k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $3.2M → 14%DANA-FARBERHARVARD CANCER CENTER: $1.8M → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1.0M → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CA: $880k → 13%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.6M → 16%MOORES CANCER CENTER AT UC SAN DIEGO HEALTHUCSD: $1.0M → 11%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPIAL: $1.2M → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1.0M → 15%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1.0M → 15%ABRAMSON CANCER CENTER: $1.6M → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1.1M → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1.0M → 22%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION DBA MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.6M → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $924k → 17%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION DBA MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.0M → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156M · 71 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
32

Total granted

$156M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+41%

Still filing today

59%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.2M · revenue +162%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +51%
  • University of Chicago
    7× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF SAINT ASAPH
    one grant, 2018 · $2.9M
  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $2.2M
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIgraduated
    3× · 2019–2024 · $924k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Hope; the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/73
Grantees still filing
63/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $7,003,333 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $5,601,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $5,300,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL C…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $4,700,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $4,445,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $3,362,002 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $3,300,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON: $3,275,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $3,100,000 · OtherCHURCH OF SAINT ASAPH: $2,900,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $2,700,688 · Other+39 more: $34,171,053 · Other+39 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $6,789,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago: $6,050,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,412,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYL…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,363,622 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…New York University: $4,100,000 · EducationNew York UniversityWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,000,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY I…Albert Einstein College of Medicine: $3,600,000 · EducationAlbert Einstein College of MedicineJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,400,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYBaylor College of Medicine: $3,400,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineYale University: $2,800,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $2,600,000 · EducationEmory University: $2,570,213 · Education+15 more: $11,535,387 · Education+15 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $9,175,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Instit…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,495,243 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING …Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,550,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Ce…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,600,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL O…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR…H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,328,356 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,200,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $2,200,000 · HealthBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $2,200,000 · HealthSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $1,700,000 · HealthThe Institute For Cancer Research: $1,628,622 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,600,000 · Health+21 more: $7,911,253 · Health+21 moreMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $91,573 · AnimalsThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,005,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $600,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $1,400,000 · Recreation & SportsPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $600,000 · PhilanthropyOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Philanthropy
Other$79,858,076Education$63,620,722Health$44,188,474Animals$2,091,573Science & Tech$1,605,000Recreation & Sports$1,400,000Philanthropy$900,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $9,175,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $6,789,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $6,050,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,495,243 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,412,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,363,622 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $4,100,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,000,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,000,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $3,600,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,550,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,400,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $3,400,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $3,100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYale University: $2,800,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,600,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $2,570,213 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,328,356 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $2,200,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $2,200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $1,700,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research: $1,628,622 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,600,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1,400,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,400,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $1,400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,005,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $923,981 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $900,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $883,246 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $800,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $600,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC: $600,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $600,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $481,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE: $450,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Albert Einstein College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayo ClinicMN25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayo Clinic · American Cancer Society Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Heart Association Inc · Yale University · Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation · Breakthrough T1d · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Public Health Institute · American Lung Association · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The V Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The V Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • American Gastroenterological Association Institute: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on V’s filings →

More from the funding graph