How much did THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES grant in FY2024?

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES reported 35 grants totaling $4,076,435 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES based?

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES is based in NY.

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES

Supporting members through policy development, advocacy and capacity building activities.

$4.1M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$295k

Largest

01What you fund

0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$4.5MCommunity Improvement$2.5MHousing & Shelter$462kRecreation & Sports$398kArts & Culture$83kCrime & Legal$13kOther$2.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

empower

2019

tenantsgoddard riversiderecreationalbronxworkstoddlerseducationmental

2020

grand streetgoalpartnershipnowimpactexpansionslots

2021

hmhoffersenrichingcreateartsriverdalebetter

2023

artscreateriverdalegrand streetsoutheast bronxbetteradvance

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k9 grants · $261k
$50k–250k25 grants · $3.4M
$250k+1 grant · $295k

$108,050

Median grant

States reached

$16M

Total assets

Largest grants

CAMBA$294,750
ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$245,486
QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE$233,800
SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES$212,000
PROJECT HOSPITALITY$209,550
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$200,211
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$198,788
SAINT NICK'S ALLIANCE$175,111
BRONXWORKS$169,300
WHEDCO$158,050
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE$156,040
JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT$145,850
NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION$144,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE$137,850
GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER$126,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 37 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+112%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

QC
Queens Community House
7× · 2017–2024 · $787k · revenue +111%
PH
Project Hospitality
5× · 2019–2024 · $675k · revenue +53%
C
CAMBA
4× · 2020–2024 · $651k · revenue +39%

Funded once

SM
Stanley M Isaacs Nbrhd Ctrgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +25%
UC
United Community Centers Incgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue +44%
HH
Hartley Housegraduated
one grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunites for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and…

Human Services

Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy

To achieve social, economical, enivronmental and racial justice for our communities through community organizing, neighborhood improvement and housing preservation.

Community Improvement

Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter

BronxCare Health Integrated Services System Inc

To support and monitor health care services provided to the bronx community.

Health

The Neighborhood Self-Help

Neighborhood s.h.o.p.p. is a multi-service agency, servicing seniors residing in bronx.

Human Services

Hudson Yards Development Corporation

Manages the implementation of the city of new york's economic initiatives for the redevelopment of the hudson yards area of manhattan, including extension of no. 7 subway to west 34th st, construction of public amenities including parks…

Community Improvement

The Center for New York City

Housing & Shelter

Union Community Health Center Inc

To serve the community with informed, innovative, and outcome-oriented health care services designed and delivered to improve the health of bronx residents.

Health

BronxCare Special Care Center Inc

To deliver quality and efficient healthcare services to residents of the bronx and new york city.

Health

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Housing & Economic Development and the most unlike its peers is St Nicks Alliance Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/44

the rest of the field

10%

3,932/40,191

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

44/44

Grantees still filing

44/44

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$4,472,627Other$2,488,577Community Improvement$2,475,420Housing & Shelter$461,643Recreation & Sports$397,768Arts & Culture$82,661Crime & Legal$12,934

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY53.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · United Way of New York City · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Food Bank for New York City · The New York Community Trust · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation Of · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Clark Foundation · Citymeals-On-Wheels

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Ocean Bay Community Dev Corp.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 841622031 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Ocean Bay Community Dev Corp, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The United Neighborhood Houses?

Find your warmest path to The United Neighborhood Houses through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The United Neighborhood Houses?

More from the funding graph

THE UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

44 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The United Neighborhood Houses?

More from the funding graph