Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Turfah Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$497kInternational$336kHealth$46kEducation$44kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$464k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SADR FOUNDATION$95,000
ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL$20,000
NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASS$10,000
TAHA FOUNDATION$5,000
GREAT REVELATION ACADEMY$5,000
MAYA SCHOOL$1,000
UNITED HUMANATARAIN FOUNDATION$1,000
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $17k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 9 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$933k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+22%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GREAT REVELATIONS ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $485k · revenue +90%
  • SF
    SADR FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $229k · revenue +126%
  • ZI
    ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • TI
    TAWHEED INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
—
3
Hamzah Islamic Center Inc

Practice and education of Islam

Religion
4
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
5
Islamic Academy of Alabama- Inc

The mission of the school is to ensure that Muslim students positively contribute to a global society by providing an education which maximizes the student's learning potential in a safe, stimulating, Islamic environment.

Education
6
American Islamic College

Educate the chicago community in particular and the american community in general in arabic and islamic studies

—
7
American Imam Academy

Education

Religion
8
Islamic Academy of Riverside

The Islamic Academy of Riverside is a WASC-accredited privately funded K-8 program dedicated to providing quality education in a culturally respectful environment.

Education
9
Ibrahim Center

Provide religious education, space and mentorship.

Religion
10
Islamic University of Minnesota

To support the betterment of our society through a balanced, moderate, and authentic islamic education.

Education
11
Ahlulbait Foundation

Education

Religion
12
Tawheed Foundation for Knowledge & Development Inc

Organize religious classes by scholars Via Zoom, teleconference, seminars Provide financial help on humanitarian ground Distribute printed books, materials posting YouTube lectures. To sustain our services , actualize our vision , our…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Islamic House of Wisdom Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sadr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREAT REVELATIONS ACADEMY INC: $485,000 · ReligionGREAT REVELATIONS ACADEMY INC+2 more: $16,000 · ReligionSADR FOUNDATION: $229,000 · PhilanthropySADR FOUNDATIONZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $105,630 · Human ServicesZAMAN INTERN…NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASS: $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL A…Individual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual…PEOPLE FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 · OtherPEOPLE FOR…MAYA SCHOOL: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $4,400 · OtherAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $30,000 · EducationTAHA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Religion$501,000Philanthropy$229,000Human Services$105,630Other$85,900Education$35,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT REVELATIONS ACADEMY INC: $485,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetSADR FOUNDATION: $229,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $105,630 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTAWHEED INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetISLAMIC HOUSE OF WISDOM INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTAHA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT REVELATIONS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SADR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT ↗
  • Who funds TAWHEED INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC HOUSE OF WISDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds TAHA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allie & Wanda Fayz Family FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allie & Wanda Fayz Family Foundation · Sadr Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Turfah Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Turfah Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Turfah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph