Skip to content
The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger at a glance

· Private foundation

The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$714k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$8.2MRecreation & Sports$1.3MHuman Services$623kReligion$524kFood & Nutrition$465kHealth$398kEnvironment$215kCrime & Legal$199kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $440k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$11,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLA ACADEMY$714,205
Individual grant recipient$570,739
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$299,752
ACADEMIC SPORTS INSTITUTE$170,300
Individual grant recipient$140,100
ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION$130,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$49,140
SEATTLE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Individual grant recipient$39,375
UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY SCHOOL$25,000
COLEMAN FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
SPARK NORTHWEST$20,000
AKIN FAMILY FOUNDATION AKA CHILDHAV$20,000
ROUTE 21$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $100k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $75k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING REFERRAL SERVICE: $56k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING REFERRAL SERVICE: $11k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 9%BRIGHTSPARK EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $10k → 9%PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%ROUTE 21: $16k → 9%ROUTE 21: $16k → 9%ROUTE 21: $8k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $825 → 9%SOUTHEAST SEATTLE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $2k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OR
CO
VA
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 54 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
27

Total granted

$13M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+19%

Still filing today

41%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Alliance for Education
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +141%
  • VA
    VILLA ACADEMY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $865k · revenue +37%
  • SC
    SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $308k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • YS
    YWCA SEATTLE
    one grant, 2020 · $51k
  • CB
    CHURCH BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MT
    MATT TALBOT CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
2
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
3
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
4
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
5
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
6
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
9
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
10
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
11
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
12
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Center; the most unlike its peers is Route 21. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
27/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,255,164 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACADEMIC SPORTS INSTITUTE: $1,284,934 · OtherACADEMIC SPORTS INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $1,154,142 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSASEMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM: $461,934 · OtherSEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $449,876 · OtherSeattle Public Schools: $363,764 · Other+60 more: $2,102,689 · Other+60 moreAlliance for Education: $1,244,085 · EducationAlliance for Educati…VILLA ACADEMY: $864,671 · EducationVILLA ACADEMYSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $307,720 · EducationSEATTLE COLLEGES FOU…+1 more: $69,500 · EducationBrightspark Early Learning Services: $185,000 · Human ServicesASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $67,500 · Human ServicesROUTE 21: $40,000 · Human Services+5 more: $19,788 · Human ServicesColemans Family Services: $240,000 · HealthSOUTHEAST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $14,600 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $11,000 · Health+2 more: $2,046 · HealthSPARK NORTHWEST: $202,000 · Environment+1 more: $6,010 · EnvironmentFREEDOM PROJECT: $198,591 · Crime & LegalWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $61,600 · Animals
Other$10,072,503Education$2,485,976Human Services$312,288Health$267,646Environment$208,010Crime & Legal$198,591Animals$61,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlliance for Education: $1,244,085 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetVILLA ACADEMY: $864,671 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $307,720 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetColemans Family Services: $240,000 over 5y, 72% of budgetTINY TOTS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $210,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetSPARK NORTHWEST: $202,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetFREEDOM PROJECT: $198,591 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBrightspark Early Learning Services: $185,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSports in Schools: $69,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $67,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $61,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL VISIONARIES: $56,443 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetUrban Impact: $42,707 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $41,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROUTE 21: $40,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetThe Breakfast Group: $15,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetSOUTHEAST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $14,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCRISTA Ministries: $14,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8,563 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $6,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,010 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $4,085 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $2,825 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $2,614 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANEW: $1,055 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRECOVERY CAFE: $1,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colemans Family Services ↗
  • Who funds TINY TOTS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SPARK NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Brightspark Early Learning Services ↗
  • Who funds Sports in Schools ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL VISIONARIES ↗
  • Who funds Urban Impact ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds ROUTE 21 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Credit Unions in the …School's Out Washingt…The Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…McKinstry Charitable …Satya and Rao Remala …Moccasin Lake Foundat…The Satterberg Founda…Lucky Seven FoundationNorthwest Harvest Emm
Seattle FoundationWA41.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · School's Out Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Lucky Seven Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger?

    Find your warmest path to The Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tudor Foundation co Roger Rieger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home