Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tuchman Bobrick Trust Tuchman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$46kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$3kHealth$2kYouth Development$1kFood & Nutrition$1kInternational$1kCivil Rights$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IU FOUNDATION$12,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $500 → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $400 → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $250 → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$52k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+14%

Still filing today

47%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    4× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +65%
  • IH
    INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +20%
  • II
    IYG INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IM
    IU MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -9%
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $550 · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
3
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
4
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
5
Indiana Civil Liberties Union of Indiana Inc

To defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the constitution and laws of the united states guarantee everyone in this country.

—
6
International School of Indiana Inc

The mission of the international school of indiana is to provide our students with a world-class education that prepares them to be responsible citizens and effective leaders in a rapidly globalizing and interdependent world.

—
7
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
9
The Indiana Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc

The american civil liberties union of indiana seeks to promote, protect, and defend the rights, liberties, and freedoms guaranteed to all people in our state by the united states and indiana constitutions.

Civil Rights
10
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
11
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
12
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Immigrant Welcome Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University Foundation: $27,350 · EducationIndiana University Foundation+1 more: $450 · EducationIndiana University School of Medicine: $13,850 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineIU MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW: $2,500 · OtherIU MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAWJEWISH FEDERATION: $1,750 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1,250 · OtherJWAS FOUNDATION: $1,200 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER INC: $1,000 · Other+16 more: $4,400 · Other+16 moreINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,300 · Arts & CultureHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $350 · Arts & CultureDANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $200 · Arts & CultureTHE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM: $100 · Arts & CultureIYG INC: $1,400 · Human ServicesSECOND HELPINGS INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionIndiana Legal Services Inc: $450 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 · Crime & LegalLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $550 · Civil RightsTHE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC: $100 · Civil Rights
Education$27,800Other$25,950Arts & Culture$2,950Human Services$1,400Food & Nutrition$1,000Crime & Legal$700Civil Rights$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $27,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIYG INC: $1,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Legal Services Inc: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEACHERS TREASURES INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds IYG INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEACHERS TREASURES INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Samerian Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tuchman Bobrick Trust Tuchman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tuchman Bobrick Trust Tuchman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tuchman Bobrick Trust Tuchman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph