Skip to content

· Public charity

The Trust for Public Land Action Fund

Nonprofit support of park and conservation funding.

$130k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Environment$467kRecreation & Sports$306kPublic Benefit$52kPhilanthropy$30k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $119,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,483 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,983 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NY FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC$102,000
PROTECT NASSAU NOW OR NEVER$10,000
FRIENDS OF WINDSOR OPEN SPACE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VOTE YES ON PROP 407: $6k → 15%VOTE YES ON PARKS: $13k → 9%VOTE YES FOR OPEN LANDS: $25k → 10%PROTECT CONNECT AND RESTORE THE SAN GERONIMO VALLEY 2020: $173k → 10%COMMITTEE FOR CLEAN WATER NATURAL RESOURCES & PARKS: $175k → 12%VOTE YES FOR CLEAN WATER AND JOBS: $10k → 7%VOTE YES FOR THE SARASOTA COUNTY LEGACY TRAIL EXTENSION: $10k → 9%PROTECT CT PUBLIC LANDS COALITION INC: $8k → 7%GEORGIA OUTDOOR STEWARDSHIP COALITION: $25k → 13%FRIENDS OF WINDSOR OPEN SPACE: $8k → 9%HEALTHY PARKS & RIVERS FOR EVERYONE: $42k → 12%KEEP DENVER STRONG: $6k → 12%WWRC ACTION FUND: $30k → 9%VOTE YES FOR CLEAN AIR WATER & WILDLIFE: $10k → 14%YES ON P FRESNO FOR CLEAN SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS: $20k → 12%NY FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC: $102k → 7%THE CONNECTICUT LAND: $12k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 12%YES ON 2A CLIMATE: $20k → 12%WWRC ACTION FUND: $15k → 9%WWRC ACTION FUND: $15k → 9%WWRC ACTION FUND: $15k → 9%WWRC ACTION FUND: $15k → 9%PARKS FOR ALL: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
CT
CA
CO
AZ
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planning & Conservation League

The Planning and Conservaton League is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization that serves as the lobbying arm of environmental community -- passing, enforcing, and protecting laws and initiatives that safeguard our environment and communities.

—
2
Santa Cruz County Residents for Clean Water Fire Safety and Climate Resilience

Ballot measure for Santa Cruz County in California aimed at safeguarding water quality, preserving clean ocean and beach areas, reducing wildfire risks, protecting forests, enhancing wildlife habitats, and improving community spaces.

—
3
Connecting California Conservancy
Environment
4
Santa Clara River Conservancy

The Santa Clara River Conservancy represents the diverse interests of the Santa Clara River, from the flood plain to the highest tributaries, and seeks to secure, sustain, and manage significant lands and waters that provide habitat for…

Environment
5
Conservation Coalition of Oklahoma

The Conservation Coalition of Oklahoma CCO is a nonpartisan 501c4 organization representing common-sense conservation policy in Oklahoma. Partnering with its 501c3 members, CCO advocates for science-based legislation protecting water,…

Environment
6
South Bay Clean Creeks Coalition

To reclaim, restore, and revitalize the creeks and rivers in the Santa Clara Valley watershed.

Environment
7
Committee for Our Cleveland Metroparks

Local ballot issue political action committee located in the state of Ohio

—
8
International Conservation Caucus Network

To advance conservation governance through political will and to provide "on the ground" solutions to ensure sustained economic benefits while managing the earth's natural resource wealth for future generations.

Unclassified
9
Conservation Congress

Advocate for endangered wildlife and habitat protection on National Forest public lands in northern California.

Environment
10
Cook Waterfowl Foundation
—
11
Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc

CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.

Unclassified
12
California Council of Land Trusts Action Fund

Promote stewardship of natural resources and funding for conservation efforts in california.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Seattle Northeast Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Protect Connect and Restore the San Geronimo Valley 2020: $172,567 · OtherProtect Connect and Restore the San Geronimo Valley 2020WWRC ACTION FUND: $60,000 · OtherWWRC ACTION FUNDHEALTHY PARKS & RIVERS FOR EVERYONE: $42,000 · OtherHEALTHY PARKS & RIVERS FOR EVERYONEYES FOR TRAILS OPEN SPACES AND PARKS: $36,202 · OtherYES FOR TRAILS OPEN SPACES AND PARKSYES ON 2A CLIMATE ACTION NOW: $32,642 · OtherYES ON 2A CLIMATE ACTION NOWROTARY CLUB OF SEATTLE NORTHEAST FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherVOTE YES FOR OPEN LANDS: $25,000 · OtherGeorgia Outdoor Stewardship Coalition Inc: $25,000 · OtherPARKS FOR ALL: $25,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 · OtherFresno for Clean Safe Neighborhood Parks A Coalition of Parents: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $77,500 · Other+9 moreCOMMITTEE FOR CLEAN WATER NATURAL RESOURCES AND PARKS: $175,000 · EnvironmentCOMMITTEE FOR CLEAN WATER NATURAL RESO…NEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO The Nature Conservancy New York: $102,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO …Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: $12,000 · Environment
Other$565,911Environment$289,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProtect Connect and Restore the San Geronimo Valley 2020: $172,567 over 1y, 99% of budgetNEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO The Nature Conservancy New York: $102,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWWRC ACTION FUND: $60,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFresno for Clean Safe Neighborhood Parks A Coalition of Parents: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetConnecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVOTE YES FOR CLEAN AIR CLEAN WATER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Nature ConservancyVA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nature Conservancy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Trust for Public Land Action Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Trust for Public Land Action Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Trust for Public Land Action Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Trust for Public Land Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trust for Public Land Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph