Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Trumley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$58kPublic Benefit$50kHousing & Shelter$35kHuman Services$32kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$9kReligion$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Little Mary's Hospitality House$1,000
VFW National Home for Children$1,000
Shriners Hospital$1,000
Salvation Army$1,000
Helping Hands$1,000
Michigan Masonic Charitable Foundation$1,000
Optimist International$500
House of Ruth$500
Siren Eaton Shelter$500
WKAR$500
American Cancer Society$100
Make A Wish$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Kids Wish Network: $100 → 11%Kids Wish Network: $100 → 11%Wounded Warriors Project: $1k → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $1k → 14%Eaton Area Senior Center: $2k → 9%Eaton Area Senior Center: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IN
MO
VA
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$142k · 20 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
16

Total granted

$142k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+556%

Still filing today

45%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF RUTH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +117%
  • EA
    Eaton Area Senior Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +83%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BEACH MARKET INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • LA
    Lawrence Avenue United Methodist Church
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
2
Eaton Rapids Medical Center

Care. serve. inspire.

Health
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
5
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
6
Berrien County Cancer Services Inc

To provide compassionate in-home skilled nursing care and supportive resources for those affected by cancer and related illnesses in southwest michigan.

Health
7
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
8
Pace Central Michigan

To provide comprehensive care to the frail elderly population under the program for all inclusive care for the elderly. To provide education to the community on care for frail elderly population.

Health
9
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
10
Midland County Cancer Society Dba Cancer Services

To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.

—
11
West Michigan Cancer Center

Wmcc strives to provide compassionate and innovative care to achieve the best possible outcomes and quality of life for our patients.

Health
12
Wings of Hope Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

Hospice care - wings of hope hospice and palliative care, inc. provides compassionate care in the later stages of life and support through the grief experience for individuals and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Region Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF BEACH MARKET INC: $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BEACH MARKET INCEaton Community Palliative Care: $29,250 · OtherEaton Community Palliative CareMid Michigan Housing Services: $26,595 · OtherMid Michigan Housing ServicesSALVATION ARMY: $11,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVFW National Home for Children: $11,000 · OtherVFW National Home for ChildrenShriners Hospital for Children: $7,500 · OtherWKAR: $6,500 · Other+20 more: $35,837 · Other+20 moreLITTLE MARY'S HOSPITALITY HOUSE LTD: $11,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $800 · HealthMichigan Masonic Charitable Foundation: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIREN EATON SHELTER: $5,500 · Community ImprovementEaton Area Senior Center Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $200 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RUTH: $2,800 · Housing & ShelterCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$178,182Health$13,800Youth Development$11,000Community Improvement$5,500Human Services$4,700Housing & Shelter$2,800Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEaton Community Palliative Care: $29,250 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMichigan Masonic Charitable Foundation: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE MARY'S HOSPITALITY HOUSE LTD: $11,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetSIREN EATON SHELTER: $5,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $2,800 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetEaton Area Senior Center Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCourthouse Square: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eaton Community Palliative Care ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Masonic Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE MARY'S HOSPITALITY HOUSE LTD ↗
  • Who funds SIREN EATON SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds Eaton Area Senior Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds Courthouse Square ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Trumley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Trumley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Trumley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Trumley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trumley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph