Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$377kFood & Nutrition$130kScience & Tech$88kEducation$72kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$9k
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$95,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$31,500
BOLDLI$15,000
YAD EZRA$12,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$12,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$12,000
HIGHER HOPES$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$10,000
ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN$3,000
MICHIGAN AVIATION EDUCATIN FOUNDATI$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $3k → 21%ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $3k → 21%ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $3k → 21%ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $3k → 21%HIGHER HOPES: $11k → 8%ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $3k → 21%HIGHER HOPES: $10k → 8%HIGHER HOPES: $6k → 8%HIGHER HOPES: $6k → 8%HIGHER HOPES: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$916k · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$916k
$0

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25’26
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    5× · 2022–2026 · $46k · revenue +19%
  • GC
    GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    5× · 2022–2026 · $42k · revenue +3%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Detroit Food Policy Council

    The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

    Food & Nutrition
    2
    Detroit Food & Entrepreneurship Academy

    Detroit food academy partners with local high schools, educators, and food entrepreneurs to facilitate a year-round program. as students develop food-based solutions in their communities, they grow as holistic leaders who are healthy,…

    Education
    3
    Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

    The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

    Food & Nutrition
    4
    Metro Food Rescue

    The mission of metro food rescue is simple; waste less, feed more. we rescue food that would otherwise be discarded and deliver it to a network of food partners. thereby, helping to feed individuals and families in need.

    Food & Nutrition
    5
    Ypsilanti Meals on Wheels

    Ypsilanti Meals on Wheels provides nutritious meals, social contact and other services to the homebound elderly, ill and disabled in eastern Washtenaw County, to enable them to enjoy healthier, safer, and more independent lives.

    —
    6
    Eastern Market Corporation

    Eastern market is organized to combat community deterioration and to lessen the burdens of government in managing its public market that has served detroit since 1891. eastern market operates the market under an agreement with the city of…

    Food & Nutrition
    7
    Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation

    The mission of desc is to cultivate local workforce talent to align with the needs of the business community through partnerships with key workforce agencies, faith- and community- based organizations, education and training institutions,…

    Employment
    8
    Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc

    Alleviate and prevent hunger amongst Michigan residents.

    —
    9
    About Face Detroit
    —
    10
    Feeding America West Michigan

    We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.

    —
    11
    Detroit Donates Inc
    Housing & Shelter
    12
    Jive Turkey Detroit

    Feeding the families in Metro Detroit

    Food & Nutrition
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forgotten Harvest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION INTERN: $244,500 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION INTERNWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $119,500 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYYAD EZRA: $46,000 · OtherYAD EZRAIndividual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND: $44,000 · OtherUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUNDBOLDLI: $27,000 · Other+2 more: $14,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $176,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN: $39,000 · HealthDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHIL…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN H…GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $42,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS CO…HIGHER HOPES: $39,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
    Other$539,000Health$215,500Food & Nutrition$92,000Human Services$54,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $176,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $46,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHER HOPES: $39,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN: $39,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
    • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
    • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
    • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
    • Who funds HIGHER HOPES ↗
    • Who funds DETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
    • Who funds ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Thomas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Thomas Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Thomas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Thomas’ filings →

      More from the funding graph