Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Thomas and Maria Yeager Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of THE THOMAS AND MARIA YEAGER FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$938
Median grant
2
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
READINESS CENTER$1,000
LORY'S PLACE$938
ST JOSEPH SCHOOLS$250
NEW HORIZONS OF SWFL$100
ST JOSEPH LINCOLN SENIOR SERVICE CENTER$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $100 → 15%READINESS CENTER: $100 → 15%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 6 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$52k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN
    3× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue -25%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue -28%
  • PF
    PENNIES FROM HEAVEN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k

Funded once

  • LH
    LAKELAND HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CK
    CURIOUS KIDS MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • GF
    GOOD FELLOW FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
2
Hennepin History Museum

We preserve and explore history, creating spaces where our communities' stories can be told.

Arts & Culture
3
Pace of Southwest Michigan Inc

Surrounding seniors with the care you need to remain in the home you love.

Human Services
4
Humane Society of South Central Mi

Animal shelter - provide a safe haven for animals without homes.

Animals
5
Historical Society of Saginaw County

The historical society of saginaw county is committed to serve the community by telling the continuing story of the people of the saginaw region through exploration, preservation and presentation of their historical and cultural heritage.

6
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
7
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

8
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

10
Hillsdale County Senior Services Center Inc

To support and promote a means for maintaining a senior center in order to achieve specific goals, based on the needs and interests of older persons, those 50 and older except for those programs that receive state and federal funding which…

Human Services
11
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
12
Berrien County Cancer Services Inc

To provide compassionate in-home skilled nursing care and supportive resources for those affected by cancer and related illnesses in southwest michigan.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Avenue Family Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Joseph Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $11,600 · OtherST JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONPENNIES FROM HEAVEN — $6,869 · OtherPENNIES FROM HEAVENLORY'S PLACE — $5,678 · OtherLORY'S PLACELAKELAND HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherLAKELAND HEALTH FOUNDATIONGOOD FELLOW FUND — $3,000 · OtherGOOD FELLOW FUNDUNITED WAY — $2,500 · OtherUNITED WAYHANSEN HOSPICE CENTER — $1,800 · Other+4 more — $450 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN — $21,134 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWESTERN MI…CURIOUS KIDS MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCURIOUS KI…THE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER — $1,800 · Arts & CultureTHE HERITA…Hospice at Home Inc — $5,250 · HealthREADINESS CENTER INC — $1,200 · Human ServicesTHE AVENUE FAMILY NETWORK INC — $100 · Human Services
Other$36,897Animals$21,134Arts & Culture$6,800Health$5,250Human Services$1,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN — $21,134 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetST JOSEPH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $11,600 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHospice at Home Inc — $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURIOUS KIDS MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HERITAGE MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER — $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADINESS CENTER INC — $1,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AVENUE FAMILY NETWORK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH-LINCOLN SENIOR SERVICE CENTER INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berrien Community Foundation IncMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berrien Community Foundation Inc · Hanson Family Foundation · The Marzke Family Foundation · Whirlpool Foundation · St Josephbenton Harbor Rotary Foundation Inc · The Covia Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Thomas and Maria Yeager Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Thomas and Maria Yeager Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Thomas and Maria Yeager Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph