Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.9M
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$2.9M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.9MReligion$552kInternational$262kHuman Services$173kFood & Nutrition$96kEducation$83kHealth$78kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,914,673
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TERRANCE K AND ELIZABETH L BARRY FO$2,914,673
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $22k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $9k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVA: $40k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVA: $8k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVA: $1k → 13%WELLS OF LIFE: $41k → 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $23k → 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $10k → 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $5k → 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $5k → 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
NY
MA
NV
SD
CA
CO
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
HI
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 42 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 42 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
24

Total granted

$1.3M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+194%

Still filing today

38%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WELLS OF LIFE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $89k · revenue +187%
  • OO
    Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
    6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +276%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
    3× · 2020–2022 · $49k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • PO
    PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF LV
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
2
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
3
California Health M R C
Community Improvement
4
Usc Arcadia Hospital

To provide high-quality healing services while caring for the patient's emotional and spiritual needs and enabling them to achieve health for life.

Health
5
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
6
Mary Health of the Sick Convalescent & Nursing Hospital Incorporated

To provide the highest level of long-term care in Southern California. The Servants of Mary and Ministers to the Sick are dedicated to helping in the personal life transition of the residents and their famiiles in a spirit and expression…

Health
7
Sancta Maria Hospital Inc

Faithful to the spirit of the congregation of the daughters of mary, sancta maria nursing facility's mission is to witness christ's compassion, caring and love, reflecting the catholic church's role in the continuation of christ's healing…

—
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
11
Mary's Pregnancy Resource Center

Our mission is to save lives and reach souls in South Florida by serving the women of these communities through free and confidential services such as: Women's Wellness, Pregnancy Test, Pregnancy Counseling, Pregnancy Education, Referrals,…

—
12
House of Mercy
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Orange County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TERRANCE K AND ELIZABETH L BARRY FO: $2,914,673 · OtherTERRANCE K AND ELIZABETH L BARRY FOORANGE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $152,400 · Other+53 more: $931,977 · Other+53 moreWELLS OF LIFE INC: $88,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $48,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $41,000 · Human Services+3 more: $11,500 · Human ServicesOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $50,400 · HealthSOAR: $45,000 · HealthPREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $17,500 · ReligionCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · InternationalMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterMarys Kitchen: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,999,050Human Services$189,500Health$95,400Religion$17,500International$8,000Housing & Shelter$8,000Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLS OF LIFE INC: $88,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $50,400 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $48,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOAR: $45,000 over 5y, 63% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $41,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOuray County Historical Society: $30,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $17,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMarys Kitchen: $7,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS COUNTRY DOCTOR MUSEUM: $4,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSignature Productions: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEUDIST SERVANTS OF THE 11TH HOUR: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds SOAR ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ouray County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Marys Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds CASA TERESA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry FoundationNV32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Levecke Family Foundation · Laloo Vision Inc · Nobbs Family Foundation · Sovereign Military Order of Malta Western Association-Usa · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Greaney Family Charitable Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Giving University · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Terrance K and Elizabeth L Barry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph