Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ten Broeke Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of The Ten Broeke Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’18
4
’19
2
’20
2
’21
3
’22
3
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$2.0MEducation$562kReligion$55kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$25k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$200,000
University Park United Methodist Church$30,000
Crystal Charity Ball$25,000
Highland Park Independent School District$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%mayo clinic: $200k → 9%NORTHWELL HEALTH: $100k → 6%Highland Park Independent School District: $125k → 14%the brookwood community: $5k → 14%UT Health: $300k → 16%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $125k → 10%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $3k → 8%MS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $180k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $212k → 14%HOPE HARBOR: $5k → 18%Alzheimer's Association: $60k → 14%mayo clinic: $200k → 9%northwell health foundation: $10k → 6%Highland Park Independent School District: $15k → 14%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $100k → 10%MS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $50k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%Alzheimer's Association: $25k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $200k → 9%University Park United Methodist Church: $30k → 14%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $30k → 10%Peachtree Presbyterian Preschool: $5k → 13%Children's Healthcare of Atlanta: $300k → 14%Crystal Charity Ball: $25k → 14%ENDURING HEARTS: $5k → 13%Children's Healthcare of Atalanta: $20k → 14%University Park United Methodist Church: $25k → 14%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 8 repeat orgs$483k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$458k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+9%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $320k · revenue +33%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +198%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $85k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • UH
    UT Health
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • NP
    NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
2
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
3
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
4
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
Plainview Hospital

Plainview hospital is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
6
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
7
Phelps Memorial Hospital Association

Phelps memorial hospital association ("pmha") is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
8
John T Mather Memorial Hospital

John t. mather memorial hospital ("mather") is a non-profit community hospital that is part of northwell health. mather strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical…

Health
9
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
10
Central Suffolk Hospital

Central suffolk hospital ("csh") d/b/a peconic bay medical center ("pbmc") is a not-for-profit hospital consisting of acute health care, a skilled nursing facility and a certified home care agency. csh provides a full range of health care…

Health
11
Northwell Inc

Northwell, inc. is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. northwell, inc. is organized and operated exclusively for the…

Health
12
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMORY UNIVERSITY — $411,599 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITYUT Health — $300,000 · OtherUT HealthALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $255,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONMS DONOR ADVISED FUND — $229,750 · OtherMS DONOR ADVISED FUNDHighland Park Independent School District — $140,000 · OtherHighland Park Independent School DistrictUNIVERSITY PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $55,000 · Other+2 more — $30,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC — $600,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $320,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $85,475 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIA…+3 more — $17,500 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE HARBOR INC — $5,000 · ReligionThe Brookwood Community Inc — $5,000 · Education
Other$1,421,349Health$1,122,975Community Improvement$100,000Philanthropy$25,000Religion$5,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $320,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $85,475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACHTREE PRESBYTERIAN PRE-SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDURING HEARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ten Broeke Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home