Skip to content
The Tebo Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Tebo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$200kHealth$49kPublic Benefit$35kCrime & Legal$29kSocial Science$25kCivil Rights$22kEnvironment$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$9,358
Median grant
2
States reached
$297k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$18,488
ACLU FOUNDATION$10,000
UCLA HEALTH RAPE TREATMENT CENTER$9,358
DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$7,500
UCLA FRIENDS OF SEMEL INSTITUTE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $9k → 17%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $1k → 17%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $8k → 14%DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $8k → 14%DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $5k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $34k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $30k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $30k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $25k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $23k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION - FREINDS OF SEMEL: $15k → 14%ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRL'S: $10k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION - FREINDS OF SEMEL: $10k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION - FREINDS OF SEMEL: $10k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%UCLA FRIENDS OF SEMEL INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%THE PER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%UCLA FRIENDS OF SEMEL INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $5k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%PALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 14%UCLA HEALTH RAPE TREATMENT CENTER: $9k → 14%UCLA HEALTH RAPE TREATMENT CENTER: $5k → 14%ACLU: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 14%CHEYEMOYA AVE ELEM SCHOOL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 9 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$317k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $152k · revenue +20%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +66%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • PC
    PALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +52%
  • PF
    PER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -100%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Physicians for Social Responsibility

Psr-la is a physician and health advocate membership organization working to protect public health from nuclear threats and environmental toxins.

International
4
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
5
Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research Inc

Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…

Health
6
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
7
Beyond Us & Them

To offer programs and training that resource individuals and organizations in self-awareness, self-regulation, effective communication and to promote structures of belonging, utilizing council and other practices, to encourage social…

Human Services
8
Alliance for a Better Community

Advancing social, economic, racial equity and justice for the latino / a community and the los angeles region through power building and policy advocacy.

Community Improvement
9
Atlantic Legal Foundation

The mission of the alf is to advance the rule of law by advocating limited and efficient government, free enterprise, individual liberty, property rights, effective education, and the use of sound science in judicial and regulatory…

—
10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
11
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
12
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $151,668 · EducationTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCUCLA FOUNDATION: $38,488 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONPALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION - FREINDS OF SEMEL: $35,000 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION - FREINDS OF SEMELTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $28,500 · OtherTHE RAPE FOUNDATIONUCLA FRIENDS OF SEMEL INSTITUTE: $25,000 · OtherUCLA FRIENDS OF SEMEL INSTITUTEUCLA HEALTH RAPE TREATMENT CENTER: $14,358 · OtherUCLA HEALTH RAPE TREATMENT CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODPER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $4,500 · OtherDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · Environment
Education$197,656Other$119,358Health$22,500Civil Rights$20,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $151,668 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $38,488 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tebo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tebo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tebo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home