Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$504kFood & Nutrition$288kReligion$84kHealth$81kYouth Development$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kPhilanthropy$48kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$17,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINE ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH$75,000
BEACON OF HOPE$75,000
FOOD BANK OF NE GEORGIA$75,000
SONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$22,500
FISHERS OF MEN LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
PINE ISLAND FISH INC$17,000
ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES$15,000
PAWS4LIFE$10,000
NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES$5,000
CRABAPPLE CROSSING ELEMENTARY PTO$5,000
SUMMIT HILL ELEMENTARY PTO$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY PANTRY: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY PANTRY: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $8k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Pine Island FISH Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $387k · revenue +74% · 66% of their budget
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $100k · revenue +44%
  • SF
    SONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $88k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RR
    RAMS RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • NB
    NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc

Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Ne Florida Support Corporation

The Corporation at all times shall be operated for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation d/b/a Feeding Northeast…

Food & Nutrition
3
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
6
Acfb Charitable Investments Inc

Acfb charitable investments, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
7
Appling County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to provide free food to needy families in appling county.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of East Alabama Inc

To feed the needy

—
9
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
10
Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc

Alleviate hunger by collection & distribution of donated food & other essentials in indian river, martin, okeechobee & st. lucie counties.

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Golden Harvest Food Bank Inc

Golden harvest food bank, inc.'s mission is "feeding lives together."

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pine Island Community Church Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pine Island FISH Inc: $387,000 · OtherPine Island FISH IncFOOD BANK OF NE GEORGIA: $191,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF NE GEORGIABEACON OF HOPE: $178,000 · OtherBEACON OF HOPEPAWS4LIFE: $40,000 · OtherCRABAPPLE CROSSING ELEMENTARY PTO: $39,500 · Other+14 more: $141,500 · Other+14 morePINE ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $135,000 · ReligionPINE ISLAN…FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $22,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA C…SONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $87,500 · Youth DevelopmentATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $80,000 · HealthNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$977,000Religion$135,000Food & Nutrition$122,000Youth Development$87,500Health$80,000Human Services$66,000Philanthropy$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPine Island FISH Inc: $387,000 over 9y, 66% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $87,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $36,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS EDISON & HENRY FORD WINTER ESTATES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pine Island FISH Inc ↗
  • Who funds PINE ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SONGS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS EDISON & HENRY FORD WINTER ESTATES INC ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Taylor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Taylor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Taylor Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph