Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tabio Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$9kAnimals$9kEducation$2kHuman Services$1kInternational$1kRecreation & Sports$750Philanthropy$250Public Benefit$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION PR$1,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of Am$1,000
Harlem Children's Zone$1,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC$450
HUNTER JUMPER EXHIBITORS OF OKLAHOM$250
American Heart Association$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Harlem Children's Zone: $1k → 17%Emergency Infant services: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
KS
DC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18k · 6 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$18k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+49%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • WH
    WAR HORSES FOR VETERANS INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +330%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CS
    Colegio San Ignacio de Loyola
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • US
    Ukraine Save the Children
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TS
    Tulsa SPCAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $258 · revenue +134%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
8
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
9
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
10
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
11
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
12
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is War Horses for Veterans Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION PR — $8,400 · OtherNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION PRColegio San Ignacio de Loyola — $1,000 · OtherColegio San Ignacio de LoyolaUkraine Save the Children — $1,000 · OtherUkraine Save the ChildrenHUNTER JUMPER EXHIBITORS OF OKLAHOM — $750 · OtherHUNTER JUMPER EXHIBITORS OF OKLAHOMIndividual grant recipient — $475 · Other+2 more — $500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA…WAR HORSES FOR VETERANS INC — $2,800 · HealthWAR HORSES FOR VETERANS INC+2 more — $500 · Health+2 moreHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc — $250 · Human ServicesWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,020 · EducationTulsa SPCA — $258 · AnimalsCONSUMER REPORTS INC — $250 · Public BenefitTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $250 · Philanthropy
Other$12,125Health$8,300Human Services$1,250Education$1,020Animals$258Public Benefit$250Philanthropy$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAR HORSES FOR VETERANS INC — $2,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa SPCA — $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tabio Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph