Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sydnor Olga Oden Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$266k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$756kEducation$458kYouth Development$129kHuman Services$78kArts & Culture$60kEnvironment$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kReligion$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS HEARING INSTITUTE$70,000
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OFFICE OF PHILANTHROPY$39,000
THE SUMMER INSTITUTE AT PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL$28,000
THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT$20,000
THE RISE SCHOOL$15,000
THE BURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$7,500
THE KINKAID SCHOOL$5,000
WILL ERWIN HEADACHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON$5,000
GENERATION ONE$5,000
THE GATEHOUSE$5,000
THE HOPE & HEALING CENTER & INSTITUTE$5,000
THE MONARCH COMMUNITY$5,000
PRO-VISION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GENERATION ONE: $5k → 16%CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $3k → 14%BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS: $5k → 14%THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 33 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

64%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
    5× · 2018–2024 · $320k · revenue +9%
  • Camp For All Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $82k · revenue +278%
  • Culver Educational Foundation
    4× · 2018–2022 · $80k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -1%
  • LF
    LEAF FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TH
    THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE CO INC THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +287%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

4
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
5
John P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science

The Health Museum is an innovative science center that provides an interactive and entertaining experience for all ages, promotes understanding and appreciation of the human body, mind, and spirit, and inspires a lifelong commitment to…

Arts & Culture
6
Houston's Amazing Place Inc

Amazing Place empowers families facing the challenges of dementia and Alzheimer's and advances brain health for all. The Organization serves adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia, caregiving families and…

Human Services
7
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
9
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
10
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
11
The Heritage Society

The Heritage Society (THS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1954 whose mission is to tell the stories of the diverse history of Houston and Texas through collections, exhibits, the arts, educational programs, film, video, and other…

12
Baptist Health System Inc

To make hope, healing and well-being accessible to every person as an expression of God's love.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Burton Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyK-12 Schools and Educationa…Medical Centers and Disease…Vulnerable Youth Support Se…Christian Discipleship Mini…Animal Rescue and WelfareSchool Parent-Teacher Organ…Arts & Cultural Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%9%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr8%20%35–55yr10%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%3%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr8%9%35–55yr10%55%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
18%
6,412/35,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $320,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECHCulver Educational Foundation — $80,000 · EducationCulver Educational FoundationThe Brookwood Community Inc — $62,500 · EducationThe Brookwood Community IncJoy Development School — $50,000 · EducationJoy Development SchoolARCHWAY ACADEMY — $44,500 · EducationARCHWAY ACADEMY+5 more — $67,000 · Education+5 moreTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OFFICE OF PHILANTHROPY — $96,500 · OtherTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OFFICE OF PHILANTHRO…THE RISE SCHOOL — $87,500 · OtherTHE RISE SCHOOLTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER PEDIATRIC OSTEOSARCOMA PROGRAM — $85,000 · OtherTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER PEDIAT…THE HOPE & HEALING CENTER — $37,000 · OtherTHE HOPE & HEALING CENTERNICK FINNEGAN MINISTRY — $35,000 · OtherTHE SUMMER INSTITUTE AT PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL — $33,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH — $25,000 · OtherLEAF FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Other+24 more — $252,500 · Other+24 moreRiver Oaks Garden Club — $45,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILL ERWIN HEADACHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $38,500 · EnvironmentHouston Botanic Garden — $7,500 · EnvironmentCamp For All Foundation — $82,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $20,000 · Human ServicesGENERATION ONE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS — $5,000 · Human ServicesCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER — $2,500 · Human ServicesBURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $55,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBURKE ARTS COUNCIL INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE CO INC THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE COUNTY — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBo's Place — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$624,000Other$676,500Environment$91,000Youth Development$84,500Human Services$67,500Public Safety & Disaster$55,000Arts & Culture$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $320,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCamp For All Foundation — $82,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc — $62,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $55,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetJoy Development School — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRiver Oaks Garden Club — $45,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetARCHWAY ACADEMY — $44,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WILL ERWIN HEADACHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $38,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetBURKE ARTS COUNCIL INC — $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc — $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE CO INC THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIARMEADOW CHARTER SCHOOL PARENT- TEACHER ORGANIZATION — $20,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO-VISION INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHope and Healing Center & Institute — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGENERATION ONE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION — $10,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTERS CREEK ELEMENTARY PTA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOSPITALITY APARTMENTS — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHouston Botanic Garden — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBETH HOUSE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MONARCH COMMUNITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBo's Place — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION-TEXAS CHAPTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation
  • Who funds Culver Educational Foundation
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc
  • Who funds BURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds Joy Development School
  • Who funds River Oaks Garden Club
  • Who funds ARCHWAY ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE WILL ERWIN HEADACHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BURKE ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc
  • Who funds THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE CO INC THE HISTORY MUSEUM OF BURKE COUNTY
  • Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT
  • Who funds BRIARMEADOW CHARTER SCHOOL PARENT- TEACHER ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PRO-VISION INC
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds Hope and Healing Center & Institute
  • Who funds GENERATION ONE INC
  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HUNTERS CREEK ELEMENTARY PTA
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY APARTMENTS
  • Who funds Houston Botanic Garden

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable FoundationTX25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The John M O'Quinn Foundation · Vivian L Smith Foundation · Strake Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Marek Family Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Ellwood Foundation · Wayne Duddlesten Foundation · The Kayser Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sydnor Olga Oden Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph