· Public charity
The Sword of the Spirit
To promote the spread of the gospel and the strengthening of god's people- catholic, protestant, and orthodox- worldwide, through a program of active evangelism, christian community formation, doctrinal and moral instruction, ecumenism, and programs for the poor and disadvantaged.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $15,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $60,774 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,774 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN OUTREACH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $46k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WOWORK OF CHRIST COMMUNITY6× · 2017–2023 · $288k · revenue +1%
- UCUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN OUTREACH2× · 2023–2024 · $57k · revenue +20%
- POPEOPLE OF GOD3× · 2019–2021 · $46k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- TOTRIUMPH OF THE CROSS COMMUNITY INCone grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue -7% · 32% of their budget
- GMGrandly Missions Incone grant, 2022 · $59k · revenue -7% · 54% of their budget
- POPEOPLE OF GOD COMMUNITYone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church
Christ Our Life Ministries is dedicated to bring an expanded awareness of the mystery of the gospel to the Twenty First-century Church of Christ. The organization's purpose is to share truths that enable Christians to know who they are in…
Make disciples of Jesus that make new disciples
The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey his commands now…
To promote Christian ministry through campus outreach, student discipleship, missions support, and gospel conversations
Provide Christian teaching, training, and worship.
Odc nbsp;provides nbsp;ministry nbsp;to nbsp;the nbsp;total nbsp;man nbsp;by nbsp;providing nbsp;biblical nbsp;teaching nbsp;sound nbsp;instruction nbsp;and nbsp;practical nbsp;application nbsp;for nbsp;day-to-day nbsp;life nbsp;ultimately…
Teach the word of god
Our mission is to partner Christians together to accelerate the spread of the Gospel. Please see attachment for additional details.
Exodus' mission is to establish and maintain a church modeled after the Biblical, Christian community as recorded in the Christian Bible, for the advancement of the Gospel of Jesus Christ by al] available legal means, both in local and…
The Church trains and equips believers as leaders who can carry the Gospel of Jesus Christ in to the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Christian Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Grandly Missions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Word of Life · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sword of the Spirit funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.