Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sweetwood Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Public Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$1kCrime & Legal$1kHuman Services$1kEnvironment$815Animals$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,067
FRIENDS OF SHAWANGUNK GRASSLANDS NWR$815
THE MILESTONE HOUSE$500
ST JUDE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
N CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION$500
N CALDWELL FIRE DEPARTMENT$100
WEST ESSEX FIRST AID SQUAD$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%NLARTS: $1k → 22%SEMPER FI: $1k → 11%ELLIOT'S LEGACY: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF SHAWANGUNK GRASSLANDS NWR: $815 → 16%ST JUDE: $500 → 17%WILLIAM MASON HSA: $2k → 4%NEW BRIDGE: $1k → 7%FAIRFIELD POLICE: $5k → 16%THE MILESTONE HOUSE: $500 → 4%NEW BRIDGE: $500 → 7%FAIRFIELD POLICE: $3k → 16%THE MILESTONE HOUSE: $500 → 4%FAIRFIELD POLICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%THE RAPTOR TRUST: $500 → 4%FAIRFIELD POLICE: $500 → 16%FAIRFIELD POLICE: $400 → 16%NORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%N CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%NORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%NORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%N CALDWELL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12k · 4 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$12k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-14%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k
  • NC
    NORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue -2%
  • NB
    NEW BRIDGE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • N
    NLArtsgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +72%
  • FP
    FAIRFIELD POLICE FOUNDATIONINC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newark Police Foundation Inc

The newark police foundation's mission is enhancing the effectiveness of the newark police division ("division"). the foundation provides resources to the division that are not readily available through other means, and supports innovative…

Crime & Legal
2
Fairfield Police Foundation Ct Inc

The corporation will seek to raise money to raise and distribute funds to the fairfield police department for essential equipment and training typically outside the municipal budget as well as cost associated with officer wellness, that…

Public Benefit
3
Newport News Police Dept Foundation

The purpose of the newport news police foundation is to improve and secure the quality of life, public safety and environment of the citizens of the city, its businesses and institutions, and its visitors recognizing that the newport news…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
New Jersey Law Enforcement Police Foundation

To provide funds to the law enforcement community in times of crisis

Public Benefit
5
Claremont Police Foundation

Supporting and enhancing the crucial work of the Claremont Police Department

Philanthropy
6
Middlesex County Chiefs of Police Association Inc

To secure a closer offical & personal relationship among members and law enforcement professionals throughout the county of Middlesex NJ

Crime & Legal
7
Fall River Police Working Dog Foundation Inc

Raise money to maintain police canine

Animals
8
Lakehurst Police Foundation Inc

The organization's main purpose is to aid and asist police officers and their families by giving grants, to provide the public at large with programs for youth in an effort to keep them away from crime, and to support and aid the missions…

Crime & Legal
9
North Sound Police Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
10
Carlstadt Firefighters Foundation

Fire protection for borough of carlstadt

Education
11
Richmond Police Foundation

The mission of the richmond police foundation is to bring together business, professional, civic and nonprofit organizations and individual citizens to promote public safety by providing resources to the richmond police department (rpd).…

Crime & Legal
12
Lafayette Police Foundation

Provide resources to the lafayette police department for the purpose of assisting the department fulfill its mission to improve public safety and community outreach, foster stronger ties with schools and children of lafayette, decrease…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Caldwell Police Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $8,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW BRIDGE — $1,500 · OtherNEW BRIDGEIndividual grant recipient — $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,005 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEMPER FI — $1,000 · OtherSEMPER FIFRIENDS OF SHAWANGUNK GRASSLANDS NWR — $815 · OtherFRIENDS OF SHAWANGUNK GRASSLANDS NWRST JUDE — $500 · Other+2 more — $200 · OtherLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,067 · HealthLUNG CANCE…Milestone House Inc — $1,000 · HealthMilestone …FAIRFIELD POLICE FOUNDATIONINC — $1,250 · Crime & LegalCALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION — $500 · Crime & LegalNORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · PhilanthropyNLArts — $1,480 · Arts & CultureTHE RAPTOR TRUST — $500 · Animals
Other$14,920Health$2,067Crime & Legal$1,750Philanthropy$1,500Arts & Culture$1,480Animals$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH CALDWELL POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNLArts — $1,480 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFAIRFIELD POLICE FOUNDATIONINC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,067 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMilestone House Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST ESSEX FIRST AID SQUAD INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sweetwood Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph