Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Susan & Eric Sipf Family Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$149kYouth Development$58kReligion$19kPhilanthropy$18kHealth$17kPublic Benefit$13kInternational$3k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION$15,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN$3,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$3,000
COLORADO UPLIFT$2,500
DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION$2,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT USA: $5k → 11%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%COLORADO UPLIFT: $10k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN: $3k → 8%COLORADO UPLIFT: $5k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $3k → 8%COLORADO UPLIFT: $5k → 12%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $6k → 12%COLORADO UPLIFT: $5k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%COLORADO UPLIFT: $5k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%COLORADO UPLIFT: $5k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%COLORADO UPLIFT: $3k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%COLORADO UPLIFT: $3k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ECONOMIC LITERACY COLORADO: $3k → 12%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER INC: $3k → 12%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER INC: $3k → 12%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER INC: $3k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $5k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $5k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 10 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$268k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+36%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropySocial ScienceInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +194%
  • CU
    COLORADO UPLIFT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +12%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $18k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
4
Colorado Academy

Creating curious, kind, courageous, and adventurous learners and leaders.

Education
5
Denver Scholarship Foundation

Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…

Education
6
The Colorado College

At colorado college our goal is to provide the finest liberal arts education in the country. drawing upon the adventurous spirit of the rocky mountain west, we challenge students, one course at a time, to develop those habits of intellect…

Education
7
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
8
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
11
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
12
Kent Denver Country Day School

Excellence in scholarship and character is the goal of a kent denver education. the school seeks to build a caring, diverse community of responsible citizens. to that end, the school provides a challenging college preparatory curriculum…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $100,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATIONCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $40,000 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INCUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $7,500 · EducationCOLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $24,000 · OtherCOLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATIONBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $19,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $17,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER INC: $17,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CHAPTER …TURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 · OtherDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $17,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $7,500 · Social ScienceJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $3,000 · International
Education$147,500Other$100,000Philanthropy$17,500Social Science$7,500International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $100,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $24,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $17,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Downing Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Susan & Eric Sipf Family Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Susan & Eric Sipf Family Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Susan & Eric Sipf Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph