Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stowers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$19MEducation$7.2MInternational$5.1MHuman Services$4.4MReligion$315kArts & Culture$205kCommunity Improvement$150kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $197k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $808k
  • $250k+11 grants · $5.8M
$133,103
Median grant
4
States reached
$204M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH$1,027,770
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$1,000,000
VPKJL FUND$1,000,000
CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$500,000
VPKJL FUND$500,000
GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$450,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$300,000
ROSE BROOKS$300,000
VALLEY HOPE FOUNDATION$250,000
WARREN VILLAGE$250,000
SCRIPPS TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE$250,000
FIRST CALL$175,000
VPKJL FUND$150,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$133,103
KANSAS CITY FARM SCHOOL AT GIBBS ROAD$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SYNERGY SERVICES: $250k → 8%WARREN VILLAGE: $250k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $250k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $250k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $97k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $75k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $65k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $25k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $25k → 12%PAWSPERITY: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 28 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$44M
$640k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-17%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $445k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +19%
  • OB
    OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +23%
  • GP
    GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SS
    SYNERGY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY HOSPICE AND PALLATIVE CARE
    one grant, 2024 · $160k
  • BS
    BLOCH SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
7
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
8
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
9
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
10
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
11
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Stowers Institute for Medical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VPKJL FUND: $9,400,000 · OtherVPKJL FUNDROSE BROOKS CENTER INC: $2,938,359 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INCSCRIPPS TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $1,250,000 · OtherSCRIPPS TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEFIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY: $1,075,000 · OtherHIGGINS BROTHERS SUGICENTER FOR HOPE FUND: $1,000,000 · OtherCROSSROADS PREPARATORY ACADEMY - KC: $1,000,000 · OtherKCPGA (GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY): $1,000,000 · Other+18 more: $2,865,000 · Other+18 moreSTOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $10,386,405 · HealthSTOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEAR…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,900,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy HospitalTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $750,000 · Health+4 more: $459,965 · HealthOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $4,976,048 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH…GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $3,450,000 · EducationGORDON PARKS ELEMENTAR…The Kansas University Endowment Association: $675,000 · EducationThe Kansas University …+1 more: $25,000 · EducationWARREN VILLAGE INC: $1,036,532 · Human ServicesSYNERGY SERVICES INC: $250,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesFORGING YOUTH RESILIENCE: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$20,528,359Health$14,496,370Education$9,126,048Human Services$1,311,532Crime & Legal$50,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $10,386,405 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $4,976,048 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetGORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $3,450,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC: $2,938,359 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,900,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY: $1,075,000 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $1,036,532 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $750,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $675,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSYNERGY SERVICES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $249,965 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $155,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRAIRIE SKY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $90,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetUNITED WE: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFORGING YOUTH RESILIENCE: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetWONDERSCOPE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPTA Colorado Congress dba South High School PTSA: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAdventHealth Kansas City Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds SYNERGY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE SKY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE ↗
  • Who funds FORGING YOUTH RESILIENCE ↗
  • Who funds WONDERSCOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PTA Colorado Congress dba South High School PTSA ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Kansas City Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO24.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Health Forward Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Sosland Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Atterbury Family Foundation · The Baum Family Foundation · The Curry Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stowers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stowers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stowers Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stowers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stowers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph