Skip to content

Connecticut · Private foundation

The Storr Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23M
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
100%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$7,502,297
Largest grant, FY2022
$7,502,297
Organizations funded a year
2 to 11
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 100% of the organizations The Storr Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
HealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20222$15M100%
FY20216$298k0%
FY20207$306k14%
FY20197$299k0%
FY20189$315k44%
FY201711$273kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$23MHealth$739kEducation$415kArts & Culture$290kCommunity Improvement$252kFood & Nutrition$20kReligion$17kHousing & Shelter$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of The Storr Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Foundation for Prader-Willi Research Inc$475,90744%
University of Wisconsin Foundation$300,00050%
Bruce Museum Inc$250,00051%
Prader-Willi Syndrome Association (Usa)$120,000110%
Prader-Willi California Foundation$120,000148%
Vail Mountain School$115,00050%
Neighbor to Neighbor Inc$20,00040%
Greenwich Hospital$10,00010%
Inspirica Inc$5,00010%
Gay Men's Health Crisis Inc$5,00010%
Vail Health Services Foundation$5,00010%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($15M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Storr Family Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Prader-Willi Research Inc: $475,907 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetUniversity of Wisconsin Foundation: $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBruce Museum Inc: $250,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPrader-Willi Syndrome Association (Usa): $120,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetPrader-Willi California Foundation: $120,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetVail Mountain School: $115,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNeighbor to Neighbor Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGreenwich Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInspirica Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGay Men's Health Crisis Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVail Health Services Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Storr Family Foundation with peer funders

About The Storr Family Foundation

How much does The Storr Family Foundation give?
The Storr Family Foundation reported 3 grants totaling $22,506,891 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does The Storr Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (93%), Health (3%), Education (2%).
Who are The Storr Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Foundation for Prader-Willi Research Inc ($476k), University of Wisconsin Foundation ($300k), Bruce Museum Inc ($250k).
Does The Storr Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Storr Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Storr Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Endowment Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Storr Family Foundation based?
The Storr Family Foundation is based in CT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Storr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph