Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Stone Family Foundation

To conduct or support activities for the benefit of the jewish community foundation of san diego.

$2.2M
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$2.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of The Stone Family Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of San Diego, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
6
18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$2.1MReligion$123kArts & Culture$80kInternational$25kEducation$10kAnimals$10k
02FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO$2,001,552
SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION$75,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$43,500
CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC$20,000
CONGREGATION BETH EL$18,000
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$5,000
HOUSE OF ISRAEL$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $2.0M → 11%BONOBO PROJECT: $10k → 12%CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $20k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $5k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $44k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $5k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $43k → 11%CONGREGATION BETH EL: $85k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $12k → 11%CONGREGATION BETH EL: $18k → 11%UCSD FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%HOUSE OF ISRAEL: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$128k · 3 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$128k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+78%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
InternationalArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH EL OF LA JOLLA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $103k
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +24%
  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BONOBO PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -59%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
4
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
5
United Jewish Federation of Utah

The federation's mission is to build and maintain a vibrant and inclusive jewish community through meeting human needs, promoting jewish identity, and encouraging commitment to the needs of jewish people.

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
7
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Family Service of San Diego

Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.

Human Services
10
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
11
San Diego Center for Jewish Culture

San diego center for jewish culture ("cjc") is a california 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that was incorporated in january 1999. cjc is housed at lawrence family jewish community centers of san diego county. cjc provides a wide…

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of San Diego County and the most unlike its peers is The Bonobo Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $2,013,352 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGOCONGREGATION BETH EL OF LA JOLLA — $103,000 · OtherCONGREGATI…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $86,500 · OtherJEWISH FED…CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH…THE BONOBO PROJECT — $10,000 · OtherTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · Arts & CultureHouse of Israel Balboa Park — $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $15,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $10,000 · InternationalUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$2,013,352Other$219,500Arts & Culture$80,000International$25,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $2,013,352 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $86,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BONOBO PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Israel Balboa Park — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stone Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stone Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stone Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph