Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Stensrud Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
5
Organizations funded FY2019
20%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Stensrud Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The San Diego Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Stensrud Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $68k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
5
’18
5
’19
1
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 6
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 20% of the organizations The Stensrud Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 30% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20195$68k20%
FY20185$76k40%
FY20176$210kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$120kEmployment$105kHuman Services$74kFood & Nutrition$70kPhilanthropy$27kEducation$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Solutions Exploring Success Post Hs$105,000417%
San Diego Opera Association$100,00011%
Families NOW$50,000128%
Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank$50,00030%
Art of Elan$20,02434%
Kids Turn San Diego$20,00025%
Feeding San Diego$20,00010%
Sierra Forever Families$3,50010%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($5k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Stensrud Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSolutions Exploring Success Post Hs: $105,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetSan Diego Opera Association: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFamilies NOW: $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetJacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetArt of Elan: $20,024 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetKids Turn San Diego: $20,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetFeeding San Diego: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Forever Families: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The San Diego FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Stensrud Foundation with peer funders

About The Stensrud Foundation

How much does The Stensrud Foundation give?
The Stensrud Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $67,524 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Stensrud Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (30%), Employment (26%), Human Services (18%).
Who are The Stensrud Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Solutions Exploring Success Post Hs ($105k), San Diego Opera Association ($100k), Families NOW ($50k).
Does The Stensrud Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Stensrud Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Stensrud Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The San Diego Foundation.
Where is The Stensrud Foundation based?
The Stensrud Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stensrud’s filings →

More from the funding graph