Skip to content
The Stabiler Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Stabiler Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$561kArts & Culture$180kFood & Nutrition$171kHealth$119kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kEducation$22kRecreation & Sports$8kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Navy SEAL Museum$180,000
Alzheimer's Services of BR$10,000
Pats Coats for Kids 20-8511422$10,000
Our Lady of Mercy Catholic Church$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Project Hope Joy Texas: $5k → 16%Self Starter Program: $3k → 10%Navy SEAL Museum: $180k → 13%The Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910: $210k → 10%Guardian Day: $10k → 10%A Door of Hope: $3k → 13%Town of Grand Isle: $13k → 15%Catholic Charities of SW: $10k → 17%St Michael High School: $7k → 19%The Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910: $150k → 10%St Michael High School: $4k → 19%The Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910: $100k → 10%Zachary Charity League: $3k → 19%The Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910: $10k → 10%Companion Animal Alliance: $3k → 19%St Michael High School: $2k → 19%Lane Regional Med Center: $1k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-8511422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%Pats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $10k → 19%225 Gives: $3k → 19%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $1k → 19%OLOL Childrens Hospital: $10k → 19%McMains Child Development Center: $5k → 19%McMains Child Development Center: $3k → 19%Central Intermediate School - Stem Lab: $4k → 19%Central Chamber Scholarship Fund: $3k → 19%City of Central: $2k → 19%Central Police Dept: $2k → 19%Central Police Dept: $2k → 19%Central High Softball Team: $1k → 19%Alzheimer's Services of BR: $10k → 19%Alzheimer's Services of BR: $10k → 19%Alzheimers Services of the Capital: $10k → 19%Blue Ribbon Soiree: $6k → 19%Tara High School: $2k → 19%Just Cause LA Inc 45-4548766: $15k → 19%Ode to our Warriors: $5k → 19%Our Lady of Mercy Catholic Church: $5k → 19%Our Lady of Mercy Catholic Church: $3k → 19%Patriot Shoutout: $2k → 19%Feeding Frontline Workers Miscellan: $110k → 19%Feeding Fed Hospital Staff: $32k → 19%Feeding Fed Hospital Staff: $7k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 16 repeat orgs$422k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
37

Total granted

$711k
$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+6%

Still filing today

19%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +257%
  • BR
    BATON ROUGE EPICUREAN SOCIETY
    2× · 2019–2022 · $23k · revenue +31%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • FF
    Feeding Frontline Workers Miscellan
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • JC
    Just Cause LA Inc 45-4548766
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TO
    Town of Grand Isle
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Cancer Foundation for Research and Education Inc

To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.

Health
2
Heart of Louisiana Humane Society
Animals
3
So Ca Bulldog Rescue Southern California Bulldog Rescue Inc

Southern California Bulldog Rescue, Inc. is a public benefit non-profit corporation organized and operated exclusively for eductional and charitable purposes. Specifically this organization will (a) instruct the public on subjects useful…

Animals
4
The Ashley Code Project

The Ashley Code Project is a non-profit organization created with the purpose of helping fulfill Ashley's dream of finding a cure for cancer by raising funds for pediatric brain cancer research and treatment in the New Orleans area.

Health
5
Louisiana Crawfish Fest Foundation

The mission of the louisiana crawfish festfoundation is to help those is need. the goal is to support community programs inst bernard parish and the surrounding areas. the result is to encourage the dailyliving of the golden rule in all…

Philanthropy
6
Cajun Tails Rescue

Cajun Tails Rescue is a dog rescue organization We save dogs and puppies from kill shelters and others in need and get them vetted and adopted out Our goal is to reduce the stray and overpopulation rates and find

Animals
7
Battle for the Bully

Animal Rescue for Pitbulls

Animals
8
Lost Ball Canine Rescue Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and find permanent families for dogs.

Animals
9
Salty Paws of Port Aransas Inc

Provide funding for the very best care to the many homeless animals that come to our local shelters. this includes medical procedures due to injuries, illness, heartworm treatments, foster support, and more.

Animals
10
Alliance of Cardiovascular Research

Research in cardiovascular medicine.

Health
11
Bull Terrier Rescue Mission

The Bull Terrier Rescue Mission (aka BTRM) is an organization of like-minded volunteers committed to protecting the health and welfare of Bull Terriers in need of homes. It extracts them from their unfortunate circumstances, and gives them…

Animals
12
Louisiana Perinatal Justice Allianc

The purpose and mission of the louisiana perinatal justice alliance is to improve the reproductive care and health outcomes for all louisiana families, to promote evidence-based maternal and infant care, to advocate for parenting families,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Companion Animal Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910: $470,000 · OtherThe Navy Seal Foundation 31-1728910UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $180,000 · OtherUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INCFeeding Frontline Workers Miscellan: $110,008 · OtherFeeding Frontline Workers MiscellanPats Coats for Kids 20-851422: $60,000 · OtherPats Coats for Kids 20-851422Feeding Fed Hospital Staff: $38,250 · Other+42 more: $197,050 · Other+42 moreBELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthBLUE RIBBON SOIREE: $6,000 · HealthA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBATON ROUGE EPICUREAN SOCIETY: $22,500 · EducationCOMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE: $2,500 · AnimalsFriends of the Animals BR Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsZACHARY CHARITY LEAGUE: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,055,308Health$49,500Education$22,500Animals$3,500Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $180,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBATON ROUGE EPICUREAN SOCIETY: $22,500 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetBLUE RIBBON SOIREE: $6,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCENTRAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,150 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZACHARY CHARITY LEAGUE: $2,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFriends of the Animals BR Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE EPICUREAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIBBON SOIREE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds ODE TO OUR WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds A DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPANION ANIMAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ZACHARY CHARITY LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Animals BR Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albemarle FoundationFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Albemarle FoundationNC13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albemarle Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stabiler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stabiler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stabiler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home