Skip to content

· Public charity

The Speranza Foundation

The primary purpose of the organization is to support and benefit, primarily through grants, the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints (here-after "the church"), its affiliated charitable, religious, and educational organizations, and other religious educational and charitable organizations whose purpose and activities are…

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$976k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$5.0MSocial Science$525kPublic Benefit$215kHousing & Shelter$203kArts & Culture$176kEducation$145kFood & Nutrition$60kInternational$40k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $976k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS$975,787
BECKET FUND$75,000
HOUSE OF REFUGE$33,000
THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE$25,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND RELIGION STUDIES$25,000
NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION$16,667
CARE FOR LIFE INC$10,000
MORE GOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 19% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE COALITION: $15k → 11%MILLENNIAL CHOIRS & ORCHESTRA: $1k → 11%NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $100k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $1.4M → 8%MORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $75k → 11%MOUTAIN VIEW HIGH SCHOOL - MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 11%NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $25k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $1.3M → 8%MORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%ARIZONA BRAINFOOD: $15k → 11%NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $17k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $976k → 8%MORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%CARE FOR LIFE INC: $10k → 11%NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $17k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $760k → 8%MORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%CARE FOR LIFE INC: $10k → 11%NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $17k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $447k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND RELIGION STUDIES: $25k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%CARE FOR LIFE INC: $10k → 11%BECKET FUND: $175k → 14%THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $185k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND RELIGION STUDIES: $25k → 8%THE WITHERSPOON INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%CARE FOR LIFE INC: $10k → 11%BECKET FUND: $75k → 14%STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND RELIGION STUDIES: $25k → 8%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $43k → 11%BECKET FUND: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $33k → 11%BECKET FUND: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $33k → 11%BECKET FUND: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $33k → 11%BECKET FUND: $50k → 14%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $33k → 11%HOUSE OF REFUGE: $28k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 9 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$6.3M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+263%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Becket Fund
    6× · 2019–2024 · $525k · revenue +81%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF REFUGE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $203k · revenue +161%
  • WI
    Witherspoon Institute Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $200k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MP
    Mesa Public School District
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TC
    THE COALITION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SH
    STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Mormon Women for Ethical Government

To inspire women of faith to be ambassadors of peace who transcend partisanship and courageously advocate for ethical government.

Human Services
3
The Conversationalist
—
4
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
5
Commonweal Foundation

Commonweal is the oldest independent lay catholic journal of opinion in the united states covering literature, the arts, religion, society and politics. commonweal through its magazine and website publishes editorials, columns, essays and…

—
6
Lifesitenewscom Inc

Lifesitenews.com publishes approximately 4,000 articles covering issues concerning life, family, faith and cultural issues. these articles reach over 20 million readers, keeping them well informed about social issues of great importance to…

—
7
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
8
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
9
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

—
10
Custos Foundation

The Custos Foundations mission is to support the worldwide operations and activities of the Catholic Church by educating the public on and preserving the five main pillars of the Christian faith: the Christian Tradition the family ethos…

Religion
11
The Bespoke Foundation Inc

To promote the sanctity of human life as recognized in the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. We do this by raising awareness for pro-life causes and by helping the Archdiocese of Atlanta support pregnant women and their children,…

—
12
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Brainfood Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $4,995,806 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS+3 more: $110,000 · OtherThe Becket Fund: $525,000 · Social ScienceThe Becke…Witherspoon Institute Inc: $200,000 · EducationMORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationSTELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $202,500 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $175,035 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionCare for Life Inc: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,105,806Social Science$525,000Education$250,000Housing & Shelter$202,500Arts & Culture$176,035Food & Nutrition$60,000Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Becket Fund: $525,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $202,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetWitherspoon Institute Inc: $200,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $175,035 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC: $60,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCare for Life Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSTELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Witherspoon Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE GOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Care for Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIAL MUSIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Shedry Dar FoundationAZ17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Shedry Dar Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Speranza Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Speranza Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Speranza Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Speranza Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Speranza’s filings →

    More from the funding graph