Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Son Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$326k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$636kInternational$300kPhilanthropy$145kArts & Culture$86kEducation$82kHuman Services$72kFood & Nutrition$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASSION$57,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
ANC CHURCH$50,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$30,000
SEASUN THEATRE ARTIST GROUP$30,000
SOCIAL WELFARE FOUNDATION$20,000
LOVE HOPE TOGETHER$15,000
DESCANSO GARDENS$15,000
COVID FOUNDATION US$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GOOD STEWARDS CHURCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WORLD VISION$4,980
IACD MISSION$3,066
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $20k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $20k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $20k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $20k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $15k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $15k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $15k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $10k → 14%LOVE HOPE TOGETHER: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $5k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $5k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $5k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $5k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 27 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$1.9M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+347%

Still filing today

19%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2018–2025 · $209k · revenue +7%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +46%
  • LC
    LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • TF
    THE FORESEABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Educ Campaign

Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries

Philanthropy
2
Glad World Inc

Missionary work

Religion
3
Korean American Network International

To spread the gospel to the underserved countries

International
4
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
5
Unification of Korea Academic Resea

Comparative studies and research concerning the political, economic, social, and cultural barriers and ties among the usa,south korea and north korea.

Arts & Culture
6
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
7
Seoul Presbyterian Church

Church

8
Happy Hands

To travel the world and the united states and pray,feed and cloth the poor. in addition,to preaching the gospel

9
Kardo International Ministries

Biblical instruction

Education
10
Utd Missions Inc

Preparing printing informational material, updating website, inviting guest speakers, traveling to various cities for organizing prayer movement for North Korean human rights

Religion
11
World Missions to Asia

Charitable, religious & educational benefit to all people. mission includes distribution of goods, services and the gospel to all people without any discrimination or reciprocal requirements.

Religion
12
Love in Action International Ministries Inc

To promote the gospel of jesus christ through acts of compassion, public speaking, and conferences. to provide food, clothing, shelter, and rehabilitation for those in need.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seasun Theatre Artist Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANC CHURCH — $358,740 · OtherANC CHURCHUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $303,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIAL WELFARE FOUNDATION — $105,000 · OtherSOCIAL WELFARE FOUNDATIONDESCANSO GARDENS — $66,057 · OtherGOOD STEWARDS CHURCH — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · Other+30 more — $432,896 · Other+30 moreCompassion International Incorporated — $209,462 · InternationalCompassion Inte…WORLD VISION INC — $90,520 · InternationalWORLD VISION IN…LOVE HOPE TOGETHER — $143,000 · Human ServicesLOVE HOPE TO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…HAPPY VILLAGE — $31,600 · Human ServicesHAPPY VILLAG…SEASUN THEATRE ARTIST GROUP — $60,000 · Arts & CultureDYNASTYS UNITED YOUTH ASSOCIATION — $500 · Education
Other$1,530,693International$299,982Human Services$239,600Arts & Culture$60,000Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $209,462 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE HOPE TOGETHER — $143,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $90,520 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEASUN THEATRE ARTIST GROUP — $60,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetHAPPY VILLAGE — $31,600 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDYNASTYS UNITED YOUTH ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds LOVE HOPE TOGETHER
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SEASUN THEATRE ARTIST GROUP
  • Who funds HAPPY VILLAGE
  • Who funds LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Son Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph