Skip to content
The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation

To assess the research and education needs of the pediatric radiology community and develop funding programs to address these needs.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$916kEducation$167kScience & Tech$31k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $230,550, the rows itemized in this filing. The $266,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$50,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$10,550
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$10,000
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $140k → 16%Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the UPMC: $10k → 11%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $100k → 22%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10k → 17%State University of Iowa: $1k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $50k → 17%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $11k → 14%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CO: $47k → 10%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE HOSPITAL: $50k → 15%Cincinnati Children's: $100k → 16%LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 14%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $40k → 16%Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia RSCH Institute: $50k → 22%Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York: $50k → 17%Washington University Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology: $10k → 21%REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF COLORADO: $10k → 10%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE HOSPITAL: $10k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 16%Children's Hospital Corporation (Boston Children's Hospital): $30k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50k → 22%Children's Hospital of Colorado: $10k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 16%Boston Children's: $30k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $30k → 22%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia RSCH Institute: $10k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $6k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+44%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2018–2025 · $376k · revenue +72%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $240k · revenue +91%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • TR
    THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CO
    one grant, 2023 · $47k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is The Duke University School of Medicine Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $376,350 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAChildren's Hospital Corporation: $240,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $210,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $50,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALI…NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $60,000 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRE…THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CO: $47,149 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $20,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNI…THE DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES…LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationLOMA LINDA U…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationWASHINGTON U…Emory University: $10,550 · EducationEmory Univer…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…
Health$976,350Other$218,149Education$150,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $376,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $240,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society for Pediatric Radiology Research and Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home