Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Skylight Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$56kInternational$26kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$22kReligion$20kArts & Culture$10kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DR GAJANG MEDICAL SOCIETY$18,000
LIVE STRONG$5,000
PRAJWALA$4,905
DR BABA NANAK EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY$1,160
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY$1,048
TIBET FUND$1,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY$1,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS$630
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
INTERNATIONAL CARDIO-ONCOLOGY SOC$500
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$432
GAMA PAINTING SCHOOL$430
FRICK COLLECTION$260
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 50% of grant dollars ($92k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 50% that went abroad ($92k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVEDO: $5k → 10%BABA NANAK EDUCATION SOCIETY: $984 → 9%GO FUND ME: $1k → 7%TIBET FUND: $1k → 17%WEBSTER AVENUE AFFORDABLE: $1k → 28%LIVE STRONG: $5k → 10%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: $1k → 14%NO MORE TEARS: $5k → 13%MAINA FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%MARIA DEL CARMEN: $800 → 10%BABA NANAK EDUCATION SOCIETY: $940 → 9%GO FUND ME ROSC FOR INDIA: $1k → 7%VIBHAORG: $1k → 8%AMERICAN HEARTASSOCIATION: $815 → 17%LIVE STRONG: $5k → 10%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: $1k → 14%MAINA FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%BABA NANAK EDUCATION SOCIETY: $875 → 9%LIVE STRONG: $5k → 10%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%GIVEBUTTER: $1k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $1k → 17%THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: $720 → 14%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $1k → 17%THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: $720 → 14%THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: $720 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%CROIX ROUGE LIBANAISEHAMRA: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 50% of all-years giving ($92k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$80k · 23 grants
Morocco$11k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$620 · 2 grants
Indonesia$430 · 1 grant
Myanmar$195 · 1 grant
Zimbabwe$103 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 22 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
34

Total granted

$147k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +34%
  • MF
    MAINA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +101%
  • AC
    American College of Cardiology
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • G
    GIVEDO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NM
    NO MORE TEARS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -85%
  • PA
    PRAJWALA A SOCIETY FOR POOR AND DE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
6
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
11
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
12
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Birthday Giving Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DR GAJANG MEDICAL SOCIETY: $38,400 · OtherDR GAJANG MEDICAL SOCIETYPRAJWAL FOUNDATION: $17,040 · OtherPRAJWAL FOUNDATIONLIVE STRONG: $15,000 · OtherLIVE STRONGAMERSAIKHAN: $10,540 · OtherAMERSAIKHANCENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY: $8,000 · OtherCENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORYIndividual grant recipient: $7,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGIVEDO: $5,010 · OtherPRAJWALA A SOCIETY FOR POOR AND DE: $5,000 · OtherPRAJWALA: $4,905 · Other+36 more: $23,499 · Other+36 moreGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $11,200 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOU…NO MORE TEARS INC: $5,000 · InternationalNO MORE TEARS IN…International Rescue Committee INC: $4,416 · InternationalInternational Re…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…Tibet Fund Inc: $1,000 · InternationalMAINA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $7,500 · HealthMAINA FOUN…American College of Cardiology: $5,213 · HealthAmerican C…AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC: $2,555 · HealthAMERICAN C…American Heart Association Inc: $815 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthKHAN ACADEMY INC: $2,540 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $500 · EducationGOFUNDMEORG: $1,300 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $263 · PhilanthropyGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMuseum of Modern Art: $880 · Arts & Culture
Other$134,594International$26,116Health$16,283Education$3,040Philanthropy$1,563Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $11,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAINA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $7,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetAmerican College of Cardiology: $5,213 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,416 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC: $2,555 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $2,540 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $880 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $815 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY GIVING PROGRAM: $500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $82 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds American College of Cardiology ↗
  • Who funds NO MORE TEARS INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds Tibet Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRTHDAY GIVING PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Skylight Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Skylight Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Skylight Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Skylight Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skylight’s filings →

    More from the funding graph