Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Skolnick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MReligion$1.3MHuman Services$120kYouth Development$62kInternational$50kEducation$37kPhilanthropy$34kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARROCCHIA CORPUS DOMINI$87,769
UNIVERSITA CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE$31,606
ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM$25,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH$25,000
FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$11,692
Individual grant recipient$3,507
Individual grant recipient$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 57% of grant dollars ($1.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 43% that went abroad ($1.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $20k → 8%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $25k → 8%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $25k → 8%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $10k → 8%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $10k → 8%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 43% of all-years giving ($1.3M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Italy$1.3M · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Skolnick Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Skolnick Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 43% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 6 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$2.9M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+10%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTH-GREEN HOSPITAL SURGICAL ROBOT
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.5M
  • CD
    CARITAS DIOCESANA DI PARMA
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1.2M
  • AE
    Adopt-A-Native Elder
    5× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES - UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • TL
    THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
6
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
9
San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program Inc

The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…

Social Science
10
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Language Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCRIPPS HEALTH-GREEN HOSPITAL SURGICAL ROBOT: $1,500,000 · OtherSCRIPPS HEALTH-GREEN HOSPITAL SURGICAL ROBOTCARITAS DIOCESANA DI PARMA: $1,181,685 · OtherCARITAS DIOCESANA DI PARMA+15 more: $261,054 · Other+15 moreAdopt-A-Native Elder: $75,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF: $45,000 · InternationalMEXICAN MEDICAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $3,000 · ReligionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,942,739Human Services$95,000International$50,000Philanthropy$23,000Arts & Culture$5,000Religion$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $75,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEXICAN MEDICAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEXICAN MEDICAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Skolnick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Skolnick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Skolnick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph