Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Shelby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$157kHealth$104kArts & Culture$70kPhilanthropy$42kHuman Services$37kInternational$25kFood & Nutrition$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE'S$10,000
AMERICA'S CHARITIES$5,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$5,000
WE CARE$5,000
MALVIA WASHINGTON YOUTH FOUNDATION$5,000
JASYMN$5,000
JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY$5,000
WJCT$5,000
PROJECT HOPE$5,000
UNICEF$5,000
CARE$5,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$5,000
MERCY SHIPS$5,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$5,000
SULZBACHER CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RETHREAD IT: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$338k · 9 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$338k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+5%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Arc Jacksonville Inc
    4× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +25%
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $32k · revenue +147%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN KY
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
4
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…

Health
9
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
10
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America's Charities and the most unlike its peers is Summit County Rescue Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Government Accountability R…Jewish Community FederationsChristian Missionary Organi…Child and Family ServicesFaith-Based Senior LivingLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionDevelopmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr9%15%35–55yr12%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr9%13%35–55yr12%57%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,017

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDAThe Arc Jacksonville Inc — $85,000 · OtherThe Arc Jacksonville IncCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN KY — $35,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN KYJACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY — $32,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY+38 more — $131,000 · Other+38 moreCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC — $31,500 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $5,000 · EducationHope At Hand Inc — $1,500 · EducationFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $17,500 · Food & NutritionRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — $5,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International — $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $2,500 · InternationalNorthwestern University — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesRethreaded Inc — $2,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$433,000Education$38,000Food & Nutrition$22,500International$22,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$5,500Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Arc Jacksonville Inc — $85,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC — $31,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRethreaded Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Garden Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHope At Hand Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY RESCUE GROUP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Dubow Family Foundation Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · Joan & H Ronald Levin Family Foundation · Ronnie & Jerrold Rosenbaum Family Foundation Inc · Vestcor Family Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Mayo Clinic Group Return · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Shelby Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Cathedral Arts Project Inc1% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc0% of income from government
  • St Anthony's Hospital Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph